Kegagalan Pelaksanaan Asesmen Autentik pada Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Di Sekolah Dasar Dan Menengah

Agung Prihantoro

doi:10.47200/ulumuddin.v11i1.688

Agung Prihantoro

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47200/ulumuddin.v11i1.688

Abstract

The article aimed to (1) describe how failure of the application of authentic assessment of Islamic education in Indonesia’s schools and madrasa was, (2) explain why the failure happened, and (3) explain what the failure implied. Using the systematic literature review, the article investigated 27 researches on authentic assessment practices. The conclusions are that (1) the failure were proved in very few features of authentic assessment at the practices, because (2) the teachers of Islamic education did not understand authentic assessment and in turn because campaign and training of authentic assessment were a minimum. (3) The failure implied in untrained studenrs to apply their acquired knowledge, higher order thinking skills and attitude in real life, identify and solve Muslim’s complex problems, collaborate and construct knowledge.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah. “Implementasi Penilaian Autentik Kurikulum 2013 Pada Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Di Madrasah Tsanawiyah Negeri 2 Palangka Raya.” FITRAH:Jurnal Kajian Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman 2, no. 2 (2017): 59.

Alexander, Patricia A. “Methodological Guidance Paper: The Art and Science of Quality Systematic Reviews.” Review of Educational Research 90, no. 1 (2020): 6–23.

Alhamuddin. “Implementasi Penilaian Otentik dalam Pembelajaran PAI Berbasis Multiple Intelligences di Sekolah Dasar Islam Terpadu Buahati Jakarta.” Ta’dib 5, no. 1 (2016): 1–10.

Ali, Mohamad, Sodiq Azis Kuntoro, dan Sutrisno Sutrisno. “Pendidikan Berkemajuan: Refleksi Praksis Pendidikan K.H. Ahmad Dahlan.” Jurnal Pembangunan Pendidikan: Fondasi dan Aplikasi 4, no. 1 (2016): 43–58.

Ansor, Halimi. “Strategi Penilaian Autentik Kurikulum 2013 Pada Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Dan Budi Pekerti (Studi Kasus Di SMP Negeri 1 Pabuaran Kabupaten Cirebon).” Oasis: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Islam 3, no. 1 (2018): 57–72.

Archer, Melenie, Dawn A. Morley, dan Jean-Baptiste R. G. Souppez. “Real World Learning and Authentic Assessment.” In Applied Pedagogies for Higher Education Real World Learning and Innovation across the Curriculum. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021.

Arif, Saiful. “Penerapan Penilaian Autentik Pada Mata Pelajaran PAI Di SMPN 1 Pamekasan.” NUANSA: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Sosial dan Keagamaan Islam 11, no. 2 (2014): 235–262.

Ashford-Rowe, Kevin, Janice Herrington, dan Christine Brown. “Establishing the critical elements that determine authentic assessment.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 39, no. 2 (2014): 205–222.

Astuti, Efi Tri. “Problematika Implementasi Penilaian Autentik Kurikulum 2013 Dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Di SD Negeri Ploso I Pacitan.” Al-Idaroh 1, no. 2 (2017): 18–41.

Azra, Azyumardi. “Reforms in Islamic Education: A Global Perspective Seen from the Indonesian Case.” In Reforms in Islamic Education: International Perspectives, diedit oleh Charlene Tan. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2015.

Berampu, Jainuri. “Penerapan Penilaian Autentik Dalam Penilaian Aspek Sikap Bidang Studi PAI di MTs Negeri 2 Medan.” Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara, 2016.

Booyse, Celia, dan Rajendra Chetty. “The significance of constructivist classroom practice in national curricular design.” Africa Education Review 13, no. 1 (2016): 135–149.

Bosnakis, Alison Penelope. “The Bigger Picture: Authentic Assessment and Visual Literacy: Applying a Nordic Approach to an Australian Context.” In Reflective Practice in Teaching Pre-service Teachers and the Lens of Life Experience, diedit oleh Gretchen Geng, Pamela Smith, Paul Black, Yoshi Budd, dan Leigh Disney. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2019.

Chong, Edmund Jun Meng, Jessica Shih Wei Lim, Yuchan Liu, Yvonne Yen Lin Lau, dan Vivien Xi Wu. “Improvement of learning domains of nursing students with the use of authentic assessment pedagogy in clinical practice.” Nurse Education in Practice 20 (2016): 125–130.

Chong, Sin Wang. “Three Paradigms of Classroom Assessment: Implications for Written Feedback Research.” Language Assessment Quarterly 15, no. 4 (2018): 330–347.

Ellis, Cath, Karen van Haeringen, Rowena Harper, Tracey Bretag, Ian Zucker, Scott McBride, Pearl Rozenberg, Phil Newton, dan Sonia Saddiqui. “Does authentic assessment assure academic integrity? Evidence from contract cheating data.” Higher Education Research and Development 0, no. 0 (2019): 1–16.

Ghosh, Samrat, Marcus Bowles, Dev Ranmuthugala, dan Ben Brooks. “Improving the validity and reliability of authentic assessment in seafarer education and training: a conceptual and practical framework to enhance resulting assessment outcomes.” WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs 16, no. 3 (2017): 455–472.

Gulikers, J., Bastiaens, T., & Kirschner, P. “A Five-Dimensional Framework for Authentic Assessment.” Educational Technology Research and Development 52, no. 3 (2004): 67-86.

Harrison, Christopher J., Karen D. Könings, Lambert W.T. Schuwirth, Valerie Wass, dan Cees P.M. Van der Vleuten. “Changing the culture of assessment: the dominance of the summative assessment paradigm.” BMC Medical Education 17, no. 1 (2017): 1–14.

Herrington, J., dan A. Herrington. “Authentic conditions for authentic assessment: Aligning task and assessment.” In Proceedings of the 29th HERDSA Annual Conference. Milperra: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia, Inc, 2006.

Herrington, Jan, dan Anthony Herrington. “Authentic assessment and multimedia: How university students respond to a model of authentic assessment.” International Journal of Phytoremediation 21, no. 1 (1998): 305–322.

Herrington, Jan, dan Ron Oliver. “An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments.” Educational Technology Research and Development 48, no. 3 (2000): 23–48.

Hibana, Sodiq A. Kuntoro, dan Sutrisno. “Pengembangan Pendidikan Humais Religius di Madrasah.” Jurnal Pembangunan Pendidikan: Fondasi dan Aplikasi 3, no. 1 (2015): 19–30.

Imroatun, Imroatun, dan Ilzamudin Ilzamudin. “Sejarah Peristilahan Tarbiyah Dan Taklim Dalam Tinjauan Filsafat Pendidikan Islam.” Ulumuddin : Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman 10, no. 2 (Desember 29, 2020): 163–176.

Jopp, Ryan. “A case study of a technology enhanced learning initiative that supports authentic assessment.” Teaching in Higher Education 0, no. 0 (2019): 1–17.

Kemenag RI. Surat Keputusan Direktur Jenderal Pendidikan Islam Nomor 3751 Tahun 2018 Tentang Petunjuk Teknis Hasil Belajar pada Madrasah Aliyah, 2018.

———. Surat Keputusan Direktur Jenderal Pendidikan Islam Nomor 5161 Tahun 2018 Tentang Petunjuk Teknis Hasil Belajar pada Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 2018.

———. Surat Keputusan Direktur Jenderal Pendidikan Islam Nomor 5162 Tahun 2018 Tentang Petunjuk Teknis Hasil Belajar pada Madrasah Tsanawiyah, 2018.

Khasanah, Alfi Mar’atul. “Peran Guru PAI Dalam Pembentukan Akhlak Peserta Didik.” In Pendidikan Agama Islam Dan Penguatan Karakter Religius Dalam Menghadapi Era Revolusi Industri 4.0, diedit oleh Lilik Nur Kholidah. Malang: Lembaga Pengembangan Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Universitas Negeri Malang, 2019.

King, M. Bruce, Fred M. Newmann, dan Dana L. Carmichael. “Authentic intellectual work: Common standards for teaching social studies.” Social Studies Today: Research and Practice: Second Edition, no. April (2015): 53–64.

Kosim, Nanang. “Implementasi Penilaian Autentik Kurikulum 2013 dalam Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Budi Pekerti di SMPN 6 Surabaya.” Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya, 2014.

Lam, Ricky. “Teacher assessment literacy: Surveying knowledge, conceptions and practices of classroom-based writing assessment in Hong Kong.” System 81 (2019): 78–89.

Lee, Icy, Pauline Mak, dan Rui Eric Yuan. “Assessment as learning in primary writing classrooms: An exploratory study.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 62, no. April (2019): 72–81.

Litchfield, Brenda C., dan John V. Dempsey. “Authentic Assessment of Knowledge, Skills, and Attitudes.” New Directions For Teaching And Learning 142 (2015).

Marfuah, Anis, dan Febriza Febriza. “Penilaian Autentik pada Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam (PAI) di Sekolah dan Perguruan Tinggi.” Fondatia 3, no. 2 (2019): 35–58.

Maxwell, Joseph A. “Using numbers in qualitative research.” Qualitative Inquiry 16, no. 6 (2010): 475–482.

Merrett, Craig. “Using case studies and build projects as authentic assessments in cornerstone courses.” International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education (2020).

Mueller, Jon. “Authentic Assessment Toolbox.”

Nurmikko-Fuller, Terhi, dan Ian E. Hart. “Constructive alignment and authentic assessment in a media-rich undergraduate course.” Educational Media International 00, no. 00 (2020): 1–16.

Nurrohim, Hadi. “Implementasi Penilaian Otentik Bidang Studi PAI dan Budi Pekerti di SMAN Dempet Jawa Tengah.” At-Tajdid 01, no. 02 (2017).

Putra, Novialdi. “Penilaian Autentik Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Dan Budi Pekerti Di SMP Negeri 4 Pariaman.” al-fikrah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan 3, no. 2 (2016): 203.

Rahman, Fauzi Puji Anto. “Literasi Guru Sekolah Dasar terkait Asesmen.” Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dasar 1, no. 1 (2016): 9–14.

Reeves, Thomas C. “Alternative assessment approaches for online learning environments in higher education.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 23, no. 1 (2000): 101–111.

Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia nomor 14 Tahun 2005 Tentang Guru dan Dosen, 2005.

Sahin, Abdullah. “Critical issues in islamic education studies: Rethinking islamic and western liberal secular values of education.” Religions 9, no. 11 (2018).

Setiawan, Dika. “Pendekatan Saintifik Dan Penilaian Autentik Untuk Meningkatkan Mutu Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam.” AL-ASASIYYA: Journal Of Basic Education 1, no. 2 (2017): 34–46.

Sugiarti, Aprilia Tri. “Penerapan Penilaian Autentik dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Kelas X di SMAN 3 Yogyakarta.” Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, 2016.

Sulistiati, Sulistiati. “Kompetensi Guru Pendidikan Agama Islam dalam Penilaian Autentik di SMA Negeri 1 Arga Makmur.” Al-Bahtsu: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Islam 2, no. 1 (2017): 143–154.

Suparjo. “Dinamika Perubahan Paradigma Pendidikan: Studi tentang Kesiapan Guru Pendidikan Agama Islam di SD/MI di Wilayah Kabupaten Banyumas dalam Menerapkan Pendekatan Pembelajaran Saintifik dan Penilaian Otentik Kurikulum 2013.” Jurnal Penelitian Agama 15, no. 2 (2014).

Susanti, Riri. “Implementasi Penilaian Autentik Pada Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Dan Budi Pekerti.” al-fikrah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan 4, no. 1 (2016): 55.

Sutrisno. Pendidikan Islam yang Menghidupkan. Yogyakarta: Kota Kembang, 2006.

Taylor, Inés, Manuel Sánchez, Mariana Luzuriaga, María Eugenia Podestá, dan Melina Furman. “Marking classwork in primary science: written feedback practices in state schools in Buenos Aires, Argentina.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 27, no. 3 (2020): 271–289.

Umami, Muzlikhatun. “Penilaian Autentik Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Budi Pekerti dalam Kurikulum 2013.” Jurnal Kependidikan 6, no. 2 (2018): 222–232.

Villarroel, Verónica, Susan Bloxham, Daniela Bruna, Carola Bruna, dan Constanza Herrera-Seda. “Authentic assessment: creating a blueprint for course design.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 43, no. 5 (2018): 840–854.

Wulansari, Zakiyah. “Pendidikan Agama Islam Dan Budi Pekerti Kurikulum 2013.” Attarbiyah I, no. 1 (2016): 29–58.

Yudistiro, Irfan Murdianto. “Implementasi Penilaian Autentik pada Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Budi Pekerti (Studi Multisitus di SMP Negeri 10 Malang dan SMP Brawijaya Smart School Malang).” Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang Indonesia, 2019.