• Agung Prihantoro Universitas Cokroaminoto Yogyakarta


In the field of classroom educational assessment or evaluation, there is a research gap in the development of three educational assessment paradigms: assessment of learning, assessment for learning, and assessment as learning. The paper aims to fill the gap by describing the development. The research methodology employed was literature review. The results indicated that two phases of the development are early and advanced ones. In the early phase, some educational stakeholders hoped to orient educational assessment toward learning, not only assessing. The early phase originated the assessment as learning which showed differences among the three paradigms. In the advanced phase, the assessment as learning together with the assessment of learning and the assessment for learning were applied in various classes in schools and higher education in many countries. The application generated scientifically empirical shreds of evidence of strengths and weaknesses and future progress of particularly the assessment as learning.


Download data is not yet available.


---------. 2010. Growing Success: Assessment, Evaluation and Reporting in Ontario Schools. http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/policyfunding/GrowSuccess.pdf

Almqvist, C. F., Vinge, J., Vakeva, L., dan Zanden, O. 2016. “Assessment as Learning in Music Education: the Risk of ‘Criteria Compliance’ Replacing ‘Learning’ in the Scandinavian Countries”. Research Studies in Music Education Volume 39 Issue 1, halaman 1—16.

Berry, R. 2013. “The Assessment as Learning (AaL) Framework for Teaching and Learning: The AaL Wheel”. Assessment & Learning Issue 2, halaman 51—70.

Berry. R. 2008. Assessment for Learning. Aberdeen: Hong Kong University Press.

Black, P. dan Wiliam, D. 1998. “Assessment and Classroom Learning”. Assessment in Education Volume 5 Number 1, halaman 7—74.

Black, P. dan Wiliam, D. 2018. “Classroom Assessment and Pedagogy”. Assessment in Education Volume 25 Issue 6, halaman 1—25.

C.G.A., 1970. “The Research Gap”. The Journal of Higher Education Volume 41 Issue 3, halaman 228—232.

Cheng, L. dan Fox, J. 2017. Assessment in the Language Classroom: Teachers Supporting Student Learning. London: Palgrave.

Chong, S. W. 2017. Three Paradigms of Classroom Assessment: Implications for Written Feedback Research. Language Assessment Quarterly Volume 15 Issue 4, halaman 1—18.

Clark, I. 2012. “Formative Assessment: Assessment is for Self-Regulated Learning”. Education Psychology Review 24, halaman 205—249.

Cookson, . 2017. “Assessment Terms Half a Century in the Making and Unmaking: from Conceptual Ingenuity to Definitional Anarchy”. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education Volume 43 Issue 6, halaman 1-13.

Cookson, C. J. 2017. “Assessment Terms Half a Century in the Making and Unmaking: from Conceptual Ingenuity to Definitional Anarchy”. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education Volume 43 Issue 6, halaman 1—13.

Cumming, J. J., Kleij, F. M. V. D., dan Adie, L. 2019. “Contesting educational assessment policies in Australia”. Journal of Education Policy Volume 34 Issue 6, halaman 1—22.

Dann, R. 2002. Promoting Assessment as Learning: Improving the Learning Process. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

Dann, R. 2014. “Assessment as Learning: Blurring the Boundaries of Assessment and Learning for Theory, Policy and Practice”. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice Volume 21 Issue 2, halaman 149—166.

DeLuca, C., Valiquette, A., Coombs, A., LaPointe-McEwan, D., dan Luhanga, U. 2016. “Teachers’ Approaches to Classroom Assessment: a Large-Scale Survey”. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice Volume 25 Issue 4, halaman 1—21.

Earl, L. 2003. Assessment as Learning: Using Classroom Assessment to Maximise Student Learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Earl, L. 2013. Assessment as Learning: Using Classroom Assessment to Maximise Student Learning. Second Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Earl, L. dan Katz, S. 2006. Rethinking Classroom Assessment with Purpose in Mind: Assessment for Learning, Assessment as Learning, Assessment of Learning. Manitoba: Minister of Education, Citizenship and Youth.

Falchikov, N. 2005. Improving Assessment through Student Involvement: Practical Solutions for Aiding Learning in Higher and Further Education. Oxon: RoutledgeFalmer.

Fletcher, A. dan Shaw, G. 2012. “How does Student-Directed Assessment Affect Learning? Using Assessment as a Learning Process”. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches Volume 6 Issue 3, halaman 245—263.

Fletcher, A. K. 2016. “Exceeding Expectations: Scaffolding Agentic Engagement through Assessment as Learning”. Educational Research Volume 58 Issue 4, halaman 400—419.

Gibbons, S. L. dan Kankkonen, B. 2011. Assessment as learning in physical education: making assessment meaningful for secondary school students. Physical & Health Education Journal. Winter.

Hattie, J. dan Jaeger, R.1998. “Assessment and Classroom Learning: a Deductive Approach”. Assessment in Education Volume 5 Number 1, halaman 111—122.

Hay, P., Tinning, R., dan Engstrom, C. 2015. “Assessment as Pedagogy: a Consideration of Pedagogical Work and the Preparation of Kinesiology Professionals”. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy Volume 20 Issue 1, halaman 31—44.

Hickey, D. T., Taasoobshirazi, G., dan Cross, D. 2012. “Assessment as Learning: Enhancing Discourse, Understanding, and Achievement in Innovative Science Curricula”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching Volume 49 Number 10, halaman 1240–1270.

Hume, A. dan Coll, R. K. 2009. “Assessment of Learning, for Learning, and as Learning: New Zealand Case Studies”. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice Volume 16 Number 3, halaman 269—290.

Lam, R. 2015. “Assessment as Learning: Examining a Cycle of Teaching, Learning, and Assessment of Writing in the Portfolio-Based Classroom”. Studies in Higher Education Volume 41 Issue 11, halaman 1—18.

Laveault, D. dan Allal, L. (Eds.). 2016. Assessment for Learning: Meeting the Challenge of Implementation. Cham: Springer.

Lee, I. dan Mak, P. 2014. “Assessment as Learning in the Language Classroom”. Assessment & Learning Issue 3, halaman 66—78.

Li, X. 2018. “Self-Assessment as ‘Assessment as Learning’ in Translator and Interpreter Education: Validity and Washback”. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer Volume 12 Issue 1, halaman 1—20.

MacMath, S., Wallace, J. dan Chi, X. 2009. “CurriculumIntegration: Opportunities to Maximize Assessment as, of, and for Learning”. McGill Journal of Education Volume 44 Number 3, halaman 451—465.

Mutch, C. 2012. “Assessment for, of and as Learning: Developing a Sustainable Assessment Culture in New Zealand Schools”. Policy Futures in Education Volume 10 Number 4, halaman 374—385.

Rust, J. dan Golombok, S. 2009. Modern Psychometrics: the Science of Psychological Assessment Third Edition. East Sussex: Routledge.

Sadeghi, K. dan Rahmati, T. 2017. “Integrating Assessment as, for, and of Learning in a Large-Scale Exam Preparation Course”. Assessing Writing 34, halaman 50—61.

Saefurrohman. 2015. “Classroom Assessment Preference of Indonesian Junior High School Teachers in English as Foreign Language Classes”. Journal of Education and Practice Volume 6 Number 36, halaman 104—110.

Scriven, M. 1967. “The Methodology of Evaluation” dalam R.W. Tyler, R.W. Gagne dan M. Scriven (Eds.), American Educational Research Association Monograph Series on Curriculum Evaluation, Vol .1: Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation. Rand McNally, halaman 39—83.

Sein, A. S., Rashid, H., Meka, J., Amiel, J., dan Pluta, W. 2020. “Twelve Tips for Embedding Assessment for and as Learning Practices in a Programmatic Assessment System”. Medical Teacher Volume 42 Issue 11, halaman 1—7.

Serafini, F. 2001. Three Paradigms of Assessment: Measurement, Procedure, and Inquiry. The Reading Teacher. Volume 54 Number 4, halaman 384—393.

Stiggins, R. J. 2002. “Assessment Crisis: The Absence Of Assessment FOR Learning”. Phi Delta Kappan June 2002, halaman 758—765.

Sudiyanto, Kartowagiran, B., dan Muhyadi. 2015. “Pengembangan Model Assessment as Learning Pembelajaran Akuntansi di SMK”. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Volume 19 Nomor 2, halaman 189—201.

Torrance, H. 2007. “Assessment as Learning? How the Use of Explicit Learning Objectives, Assessment Criteria and Feedback in Post-Secondary Education and Training Can Come to Dominate Learning.” Assessment in Education Volume 14 Number 3, halaman 281—294.

Volante, L. 2010. “Assessment of, for, and as Learning within Schools: Implications for Transforming Classroom Practice”. Action in Teacher Education Volume 31 Number 4, halaman 66—75.

Wanner, T. dan Palmer, E. 2018. “Formative Self-and Peer Assessment for Improved Student Learning: the Crucial Factors of Design, Teacher Participation and Feedback”. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education Volume 43 Issue 7, halaman 1032—1047.

Wyatt-Smith, C., Klenowski, V. dan Colbert, P. 2014. Designing Assessment for Quality Learning Volume 1. Heidelberg: Springer.

Xiao, Y. dan Watson, M. 2017. “Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review”. Journal of Planning Education and Research Volume 40 Issue 1, halaman 1—20.

How to Cite
Prihantoro, A. (2021). TIGA PARADIGMA EVALUASI PENDIDIKAN: SEBUAH PETA PERKEMBANGAN. Academy of Education Journal, 12(1), 22-38. https://doi.org/10.47200/aoej.v12i1.430