A Discourse Analysis Of Students' Metaphorical Language Comprehension In Interpretative Listening At The English Education Study Program Of Universitas Nias
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47200/aoej.v17i2.3825Keywords:
interpretative listening, metaphor comprehension, inferencing errors, discourse analysis, EFL, Outcome-Based EducationAbstract
Interpretative listening asks learners to move beyond decoding surface acoustic input and to reconstruct meaning that a speaker leaves implicit, a demand that intensifies considerably when spoken discourse is organised around metaphor. This study offers a discourse-analytic account of the recurrent errors that second-semester students of the English Education Study Program at Universitas Nias (UNIAS) produce when inferring implicated, non-literal meaning during interpretative listening. Framed within a qualitative descriptive design (Creswell and Poth, 2018), the study was conducted from March to May 2026 with the entire cohort of 43 second-semester students enrolled in the 2025/2026 academic year, engaged through total sampling. Three complementary instruments generated the data set: a Listening Comprehension Worksheet cross-referenced with an Audio Transcript Matrix, Think-Aloud Protocols (TAPs) capturing real-time inferential reasoning, and a Semi-Structured Interview Guide eliciting retrospective metacognitive reflection. The three data sets were analysed through discourse-analytic coding informed by relevance-theoretic and conceptual-metaphor perspectives, and triangulated across instruments to strengthen credibility. Six recurrent categories of inferencing error emerged: literal-meaning fixation, source-domain mismapping, discourse-context neglect, prosodic and paralinguistic cue oversight, first-language schema overgeneralisation, and processing-load-induced shallow inferencing. These patterns are traced to learners' as yet underdeveloped capacity to construct the ad hoc, context-adjusted concepts that relevance theory holds to be central to metaphor resolution, compounded by conceptual-metaphor schemas transferred from Indonesian and Nias. The study closes with a proposal to embed explicit metaphor-awareness instruction and reflective, TAP-based listening tasks into the Course Learning Outcomes of interpretative listening subjects under the Outcome-Based Education (OBE) curriculum, so that listening pedagogy is more closely aligned with the inferential demands of authentic spoken discourse.
Downloads
References
Aryadoust, V. (2019). An integrated cognitive theory of comprehension. International Journal of Listening, 33(2), 71-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2018.1522636
Aryadoust, V. (2022). A review of comprehension subskills in listening assessment and diagnosis. Language Testing, 39(4), 549-580.
AUN-QA. (2020). Guide to AUN-QA Assessment at Programme Level (Version 4.0). ASEAN University Network.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2015). Teaching for Quality Learning at University (4th ed.). Open University Press.
Bowles, M. A., & Leow, R. P. (2005). Reactivity and type of verbal report in SLA research methodology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(3), 415-440.
Bozorgian, H., Muhammadpour, M., & Mahmoudi, E. (2022). Embedding L2 listening homework in metacognitive intervention: Listening comprehension development. Frontiers in Education, 7, 819308. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.819308
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. McGraw-Hill.
Gee, J. P. (2018). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method (5th ed.). Routledge.
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2017). Metaphor Wars: Conceptual Metaphors in Human Life. Cambridge University Press.
Goh, C. C. M., & Vandergrift, L. (2021). Teaching and Learning Second Language Listening: Metacognition in Action (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Ifantidou, E., & Plata, S. (2021). Relevance and metaphor understanding in a second language. Journal of Pragmatics, 179, 197-211.
Kemendikbud. (2020). Buku Panduan Merdeka Belajar-Kampus Merdeka. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Littlemore, J. (2019). Metaphors in the Mind: Sources of Variation in Embodied Metaphor. Cambridge University Press.
Littlemore, J., Krennmayr, T., Turner, J., & Turner, S. (2011). An investigation into metaphor use at different levels of second language writing. Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 117-144.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Nacey, S., Dorst, A. G., Krennmayr, T., & Reijnierse, W. G. (Eds.). (2019). Metaphor Identification in Multiple Languages: MIPVU around the World. John Benjamins.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1-13.
Saldaña, J. (2021). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Tanewong, S. (2018). A comparative study of metacognitive pedagogical sequencing and conventional listening instruction in an EFL setting. PASAA, 55, 96-136.
Wahyuni, S., Fitriyah, I., & Hasanah, I. (2023). The implementation of Merdeka Belajar Curriculum at English department of Indonesian universities. Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies, 10(2), 307-332. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v10i2.1249
Wilson, D., & Carston, R. (2007). A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: Relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts. In N. Burton-Roberts (Ed.), Pragmatics (pp. 230-259). Palgrave Macmillan.
Yang, C., Hu, G., Que, K., & Fan, N. (2025). Comparing eye-tracking and verbal reports in L2 reading process research: Three qualitative studies. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 19(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3390/jemr19010002
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Elwin P. Zebua
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
