Public Engagement and Oversight for Accountable Governance in Corruption Prevention Efforts in North Sulawesi Province

Authors

  • Ressy Mewengkang Universitas Negeri Manado
  • Brain Fransisco Supit Universitas Negeri Manado
  • Djoly Vekky Warokka Universitas Negeri Manado

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47200/aoej.v17i2.3770

Keywords:

Governance, Public Accountability, Engagement and Oversight, Integrity Assesement Survey, Corruption Prevention

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the condition of accountable regional governance in North Sulawesi Province, focusing specifically on the dimension of engagement and oversight by all employees and the public, one of the six key issues measured in the Integrity Assessment Survey. The study employed a descriptive qualitative approach through semi-structured interviews with three key informants representing different levels of position, namely the Provincial Secretary, the Head of the Human Resources Development Agency, and a staff member of the North Sulawesi Provincial Social Affairs Office, supplemented by a review of secondary data on Integrity Assessment Survey scores for the 2023 to 2025 period. Data were analyzed thematically and interpreted through the lens of public accountability and good governance. Based on the three-zone categorization framework commonly used to interpret the Integrity Assessment Survey index scale, the engagement and oversight dimension score for North Sulawesi Province fell within the vulnerable-to-risk zone at 73.05 in 2023, remained in that zone with an increase to 76.10 in 2024, but declined to the at-risk zone at 72.61 in 2025. The findings show that formal complaint channels are available and reasonably actively used at the level of regional secretariat leadership, yet their dissemination has not evenly reached operational staff, while fear of retaliation and the absence of clear whistleblower protection mechanisms tend to make participation among lower-level employees passive. Public participation in overseeing public services also remains limited due to the perception that government responses to complaints are slow. This study recommends expanding the dissemination of complaint channels to all levels of the civil apparatus, strengthening whistleblower protection guarantees, and developing more responsive public feedback mechanisms as strategic steps to strengthen the accountability of regional governance in North Sulawesi Province.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abraham, J., Mangapul, C. J., Amaniputri, D. N., Manurung, R. H., Ispurwanto, W., Hastuti, T. D., Hock, B., & Paul, K. (2023). Intention to whistleblow: Perception of reporting skill mediates the predicting role of class consciousness and perceived probability of revenge. F1000Research, 12, 1550. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.142265.1

Adeti, B. A., & Christiani, C. (2022). Reformasi administrasi dan birokrasi pemerintahan daerah dalam meningkatkan kualitas layanan publik di daerah. Jurnal Media Administrasi, 7(1), 40–48.

Jawa, D., Malau, P., & Ciptono, C. (2024). Tantangan dalam penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia. USM Law Review, 7(2), 1006–1017.

Khikmah, L., & Purwanto, A. (2023). Pengaruh transparansi, akuntabilitas dan fairness laporan keuangan pemerintah daerah (LKPD) terhadap pencegahan korupsi pemerintah daerah (Studi empiris pada pemerintah daerah di Pulau Jawa). Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 12(1), 1–13.

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2024). Laporan survei penilaian integritas tahun 2024. Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi.

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2025). KPK rilis hasil SPI 2024, skor indeks meningkat namun masih di kategori rentan. https://www.kpk.go.id/id/ruang-informasi/berita/kpk-rilis-hasil-spi-2024-skor-indeks-meningkat-namun-masih-di-kategori-rentan

Kushartiningsih, R., & Riharjo, I. B. (2021). Pengaruh akuntabilitas, transparansi dan pengawasan terhadap kinerja pelayanan publik. Jurnal Ilmu dan Riset Akuntansi, 10(3), 1–18.

Kusnaedi, N. P. A., Sartika, D., Nurhalisyah, E., Islam, M., Deswara, M. I., & Putra, R. U. (2025). Reformasi birokrasi dan good governance dalam administrasi pembangunan Indonesia. Journal of Governance Science, 1(2), 65–73.

Kusuma, F. K. (2024). Birokrasi berintegritas: Fondasi menuju tata kelola pemerintahan bersih. Media Bina Ilmiah, 18(6), 1527–1536.

Listivaniputri, A., & Yuhertiana, I. (2022). Pengaruh transparansi pengelolaan anggaran terhadap tingkat korupsi (Studi pada pemerintah provinsi di Indonesia yang disurvei KPK tahun 2018). Nusantara: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 9(6), 1965–1975.

Marzuki, I. (2024). Korupsi sebagai kejahatan serius: Evaluasi peran lembaga anti-korupsi. Policy and Law Journal, 1(1), 16–26.

Mewengkang, R., & Warokka, D. V. (2026). Pengantar Administrasi Publik. Penerbit Tahta Media.

Paranata, A. (2025). A systematic literature review of anti-corruption policy: A future research agenda in Indonesia. Public Organization Review, 25(3), 1181–1214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-025-00847-8

Rosadi, A., Marta, M. S., Supriadi, D., Sanusi, A., & Somawinata, Y. (2022). Career opportunity of whistle-blower in the workplace: The role of privacy legislation and supervisor support. Heliyon, 8(10), e10962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10962

Sedarmayanti, & Aziz, Y. M. A. (2020). Dinamika governance di era revolusi industri 4.0: Dalam teori dan praktik tata kelola pemerintahan. PT Refika Aditama.

Setiawan, R. (2025). Peran Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) dalam meningkatkan integritas aparatur negara melalui penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah Multidisipliner, 2(3), 45–53.

Supit, B. F. (2026). Corruption as a Crisis of National Character: Perspectives of Public Ethics and Pancasila Values. Jurnal Neo Civic Education: Media Kajian Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 1(1), 53-62.

Supit, B. F., & Mantiri, J. (2026). Organizational silence and barriers to early corruption detection: A qualitative study of local governments in North Sulawesi. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v12i1.1692

Sutangsa, S. (2023). Peran aparat administrasi publik dalam pencegahan korupsi: Suatu analisis perspektif. World Public Administration Journal, 5(1), 1–12.

Vorster, H., & Nwosu, L. (2024). Evaluating policies and regulations used to control corruption among accounting officers in the public sector of South Africa: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Sociology, 9, 1371287. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1371287

Wahyuningtiyas, T. N., & Pramudyastuti, O. L. (2022). Optimalisasi whistleblowing system melalui peran whistleblower dalam pendeteksian tindakan fraud. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Kesatuan, 10(2), 359–366. https://doi.org/10.37641/jiakes.v10i2.1385

Zhao, Y., Du, Z., & Finocchiaro Castro, M. (2025). Digital governance, anti-corruption and political stability: An empirical study using cross-national panel data. PLOS ONE, 20(12), e0338630. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0338630

Published

2026-07-01

How to Cite

Mewengkang, R., Supit, B. F., & Warokka, D. V. (2026). Public Engagement and Oversight for Accountable Governance in Corruption Prevention Efforts in North Sulawesi Province. Academy of Education Journal, 17(2), 301–308. https://doi.org/10.47200/aoej.v17i2.3770