ANALISIS BUTIR SOAL PENILAIAN TENGAH SEMESTER MATA PELAJARAN PPKn KELAS VII DI SMP MUHAMMADIYAH 7 YOGYAKARTA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47200/aoej.v11i01.314Keywords:
difficulty level, distinguishing features, ability of the distractor optionAbstract
There are 24 out of 40 (60%) items that are classified as easy, 15 out of 40 (37.5%) items that are classified as moderate, and 1 of 40 (2.5%) items that are classified as difficult. The results showed that most of the end of semester PPKn lessons had a distinguishing feature of 31 out of 40 (77.5%) items having high differentiation, 9 out of 40 (22.5%) were medium, and none had Low power difference. Mid-term assessment questions PPKn have a complete check that requires 33 of the 40 (82.5%) choices have distractors working, and 7 out of 40 (17.5%) options have distractors who don't work. This must be fixed, but still waiting for problems that have a fraud that does not need to be repaired by using the deception used.
Downloads
References
Anas Sudijono. 2011. Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.
Bowo, A. N. A. 2015. Cerita Cinta Belajar Mengajar. Deepublish.
Bowo, A. N. A., & Mutmayana, D. (2013). Strategi Card Sort untuk Peningkatan Keaktifan Pembelajaran PKn Siswa SMP. Academy of Education Journal, 4 (1).
Ebel, R.L. Essential of Educational Measurement, 3th edition. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Nana Sudjana. 2006. Penilaian Hasil Belajar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
.
Nuryati, N., & Bowo, A. N. A. (2015). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran PPKn Quantum Teaching Berbasis Lingkungan melalui Cooperative Learning di SMA Negeri kota Yogyakarta. Academy of Education Journal, 6 (2).
Moh. Nazir. 2003. Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Sugiyono. 2011. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D) Cetakan ke 12. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.
Suharsimi Arikunto. 2002. Prosedur Penelitian. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Zainal Arifin. 2011. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
