Hegemony of Independent Campus Learning (Antonio Gramsci's Hegemony Study in the Indonesia Education System)

Patricia Robin; Andi Mirza Ronda; Frengki Napitupulu

doi:10.47200/aoej.v15i1.2341

Patricia Robin Universitas Sahid Jakarta
Andi Mirza Ronda Universitas Sahid Jakarta
Frengki Napitupulu Universitas Sahid Jakarta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47200/aoej.v15i1.2341

Keywords: Antonio Gramci's hegemony, Historically Indonesian Education, MBKM Capitalists, Educational Identity Crisis, Reflections on National Education

Abstract

Freire once revealed how education could liberate with the essence of "free"; truly "free". The existence of opportunities, challenges and demands continues to grow, especially for outsider students whose numbers continue to increase from year to year and need to be reviewed by the government. Through the MBKM, the government as the highest political society holder becomes an agent capable of making elements within it to submit and obey any policy made. The objective of the research is to explore the MBKM program that is proposed as a way out of the educational problem that has long been considered not to be able to meet the needs of the post-graduate student industry and titles as a Bachelor's. The goal of the researchers is to critically uncover and analyze the intellectual agents in the education system that dominate the element of the College through the practice of MBKM. The research method uses qualitative descriptive methods by borrowing the concept of Gramsci that produces descriptive data in the form of written and oral words of people and observable behavior. The results of the research show that the MBKM is an extension of the political practice of the state that is playing its role of power. MBKM is a neo-liberalization of education because the role of the state is increasingly diminishing and replacing with the private role. Students are no longer expected to contribute to the self-development or intellectuality of the nation, but what is important is to serve the private.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adit, A. (2022, November 11). Perbedaan Vokasi dan Sarjana, Jangan Salah Pilih. Disadur dari Kompas: https://edukasi.kompas.com/read/2022/11/11/130700571/perbedaan-vokasi dan-sarjana-jangan-salah-pilih?page=all.

Arifa, S. N. (2022, Januari 24). Hari Pendidikan Internasional, Bagaimana Tingkat Pendidikan di Indonesia Saat ini? Disadur dari Good News: https://www.goodnewsfromindonesia.id/2022/01/24/hari-pendidikan-internasional-bagaimana-tingkat-pendidikan-di-indonesia-saat-ini.

Asnan, G., & Indonesia. Direktorat Sejarah. (n.d.). Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Republik Indonesia, 1945-2018.

Asnawi, A., Tjahjanto Pudji Juwono, & McLaren, P. (2004). Che Guevara, Paulo Freire dan politik harapan: Tinjauan kritis pendidikan. Diglossia Media. ASPIKOM. (2022). Membaca MBKM dalam Ilmu Komunikasi (F. Junaedi, Ed.). Buku Litera.

Asrida, W., Marta, A., & Hadi, S. (2021). Civil Society, Demokrasi dan Demokratisasi. Nakhoda: Jurnal Ilmu https://doi.org/10.35967/njip.v20i2.225 Pemerintahan, 20(2), 131–142.

Brøgger, K. (2019). How education standards gain hegemonic power and become international: The case of higher education and the Bologna Process. European Educational Research Journal: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904118790303 EERJ, 18(2), pp158-180.

Cope, A. C. (2017). Unconscious hegemonic research and evaluation of education interventions. Medical https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13252 Education, 51(4).

Darmaningtas. (2012). Manipulasi Kebijakan Pendidikan. Resist Book. 343–345.

Darmaningtas. (2022). PENDIDIKAN RUSAK-RUSAKAN: Vol. I (I. Muhsin, Ed.; I). Buku Bijak.

Darmaningtyas, Edi, S., & Fahmi, P. (2014). Melawan Liberalisme Pendidikan (1st ed.).

Wisma Kalimetro. Denzin, Norman K; Lincoln, Y. S. (2009). Handbook of Qualitative Research (S. Z. Qudsy, Ed.; 1st ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.

Dirjen Pendidikan Tinggi. (2020). Buku Panduan MBKM. Buku Panduan Merdeka Belajar-Kampus Merdeka, 1–42.

Edkins, J. (2009). Teori-teori Kritis - Menantang Pandangan Utama Studi Politik Internasional. Baca Buku.

Fast, K., Örnebring, H., & Karlsson, M. (2016). Metaphors of free labor: a typology of unpaid work in the media sector. Media, Culture, And Society, 38(7), pp963-978. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443716635861.

Haryono, C. G. (2019). Melihat Industri Televisi dalam Perspektif Kritis (L. Indarwati, Ed.; 1st ed.). PT. Kanisius.

Iriantara, Y. (2013). Komunikasi Pendidikan. Simbiosa Rekatama Media.

Liliweri, A. (2018). Paradigma Penelitian Sosial (1st ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.

Littlejohn, Stephen; Foss, K. A. (2009). Teori Komunikasi. Salemba Humanika.

Made Sugiarta, I., Bagus Putu Mardana, I., Adiarta, A., Wayan Artanayasa, I., Jasmani, P., & dan Rekreasi, K. (2019). FILSAFAT PENDIDIKAN KI HAJAR DEWANTARA (TOKOH TIMUR). Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 2.

Napitupulu, F. (2022). Komunikasi dan AGENDA PENYADARAN (Kritik, Teori, dan Metodologi) (1st ed.). Indigo Media.

Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. In Teaching Sociology (Seventh). Pearson Education Limited. https://doi.org/10.2307/3211488.

Ordóñez, S., & Sánchez, C. (2016). Knowledge Capitalism, Globalization, and Hegemony: Toward a Socio-Spatial Approach. World Review Of Political Economy: Journal Of The World Association For Political Economy, 7(1), pp4-28. https://doi.org/10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.7.1.0004.

Prihantoro, A., & Fudiyartanto, F. A. (2016). Politik Pendidikan (Kebudayaan, Kekuasaan dan Pembebasan) (Mas’ud, Ed.; VI). Read. Pusat Data dan Analisa Tempo. (2022). Kampus Merdeka Ala Nadiem Makarim: Kebijakan dan Kontroversi. Tempo Publishing.

Ramly, A. M. (2000). Peta Pemikiran Karl Marx (Materialisme Dialektis & Materialisme Historis). LKiS Yogyakarta.

Ura, U., & Sudirgo, T. (2022). Pendidikan Dalam Pemikiran Ivan Illich Dan Henry Giroux. Prosiding Seri Seminar Nasional, https://garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/documents/detail/29484616.