Selected models of speech perception by students 5 semester English Education Study Program Universitas Nias of english during lecturing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47200/aoej.v15i1.2327Keywords:
Speech Perception, modelsAbstract
Understanding speech (speech perception) is an important ability that English language students must master. There are several theoretical models of speech comprehension that attempt to explain the cognitive and linguistic processes underlying this ability. As for speech perception models, 1) Motor Theory of Speech Perception, 2) Analysis-by-Synthesis, 3) Group Model, 4) Fuzzy Logic Model, 5) TRACE Model. This study aims to find out what kind of speech perception model used by students in lectures, especially in the process of teaching and learning English. Specifically, this research is classified as qualitative research. To collect data, the participants studied were the 5th semester population of the English education study program, especially at Nias University. Random samples were used and the samples were 7 people from class A. From the results that have been obtained, there are 4 (four) students classified as using the Cohort model, 2 (two) students classified as using the Motor Theory model, and 1 (one) student classified as using the Fuzzy Logical Model, so we can conclude that most students use the Cohort model they often use this model in English learning activities every day.
Downloads
References
Huettig, F., & Brouwer, S. (2015). Delayed anticipatory spoken language processing in adults with dyslexia—evidence from eye‐tracking. Dyslexia, 21(2), 97-122.
Mora, J. C., & Valls‐Ferrer, M. (2012). Oral fluency, accuracy, and complexity in formal instruction and study abroad learning contexts. Tesol Quarterly, 46(4), 610-641.
Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. New York.
Samuel, A. G. (2011). Speech perception. Annual review of psychology, 62, 49-72.
Werker, J. F., & Hensch, T. K. (2015). Critical periods in speech perception: New directions. Annual review of psychology, 66, 173-196.
McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive psychology, 18(1), 1-86.
McBride‐Chang, C. (1996). Models of speech perception and phonological processing in reading. Child development, 67(4), 1836-1856.
McQueen, J. M. (2005). Speech perception. The handbook of cognition, 255-275.
Bianco, R., & Chait, M. (2023). No Link Between Speech-in-Noise Perception and Auditory Sensory Memory–Evidence From a Large Cohort of Older and Younger Listeners. Trends in Hearing, 27, 23312165231190688.
Kelly, G. J. (2023). Qualitative research as culture and practice. Handbook of Research on Science Education, 60-86.
Leeming, D. (2018). The use of theory in qualitative research. Journal of Human Lactation, 34(4), 668-673.
Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is qualitative in qualitative research. Qualitative sociology, 42, 139-160.
Le Grange, L. (2018). What is (post) qualitative research?. South African Journal of Higher Education, 32(5), 1-14.
Jean Berko Gleason, (1998) Boston University, PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, SECOND EDITION, HARCOURT BRACE COLLEGE PUBLISHERS, Forth Worth Philadelphia San Diego New York Orlando Austin San Antonio Toronto Montreal London Sydney Tokyo
