Survei tingkat penalaran ilmiah peserta didik se-SMA Negeri Tangerang Selatan

Authors

  • Dina Rahma Fadlilah Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
  • Ayu Syifa Fauziah Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
  • Sujiyo Miranto Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47200/aoej.v15i1.2236

Keywords:

Students' scientific reasoning skill, Scientific reasoning patterns, Characteristic reasoning patterns, Transition level, Academic achievement

Abstract

The scientific reasoning skill in Indonesia is still considered low and research is rarely done, whereas in addition to having a long-term impact on cognitive development and academic achievement, scientific reasoning skill also prepares students to be able to compete in the global era. The importance of scientific reasoning skill also listed in Permendikbud Nomor 64 Tahun 2013 and Permendikbud Nomor 21 Tahun 2016. This descriptive study aims to describe the scientific reasoning skill of high school students in South Tangerang and obtain information about the importance of scientific reasoning skill. This research was conducted at 6 high schools in South Tangerang City based on cluster random sampling. The instrument used was a description test using the material of the circulatory system based on 5 Karplus scientific reasoning patterns that were developed, then the results of the tests were categorized based on the level of scientific reasoning. The results of this study are the Serial Ordering pattern 15.26%, Class Inclusion Reasoning 11.7%, Correlational Reasoning 8.57%, Theoretical Reasoning 6.28% and Functionality Reasoning 6.75%, and the category of scientific reasoning ability from all schools at the transition level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bao, Lei. & Cai, Tianfan. 2009. Learning and Scientific Reasoning. DOI: 10.1126/science.1167740.

(www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/323/5914/586/DC1).

Erlina, Nia, Supeno. Wicaksono, Iwan. 2016. Penalaran Ilmiah dalam Pembelajaran Fisika. Conference Paper Proseding Seminar Nasional Tahun Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Surabaya. ISBN: 978-602-72071-1-0.

Fahdia, Nuzli. 2017. Pengaruh Metode Diskusi Isu-Isu Sosiosaintifik Terhadap Kemampuan Penalaran Ilmiah Peserta Didik, Skripsi Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.

Nuzli fahdia, yanti herlanti, yuke mardiati. 2017.Increasing scientific reasoning within discussion of scientific and socioscientific issues on virus topics. 3rd International Conferences on Education in Muslim Society (ICEMS 2017).

Fitriani, Nurul. 2019. Analisis Kemampuan Penalaran (Reasoning Skill) Siswa tentang Usaha dan Energi di MA Mu’alimat Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta. Skripsi Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta.

ISTARAssessment.org. 2010. What Is Scientific Reasoning and Why is it Important. (http://www.istarassessment.org)

Jufri, A.W. & Setaidi D. 2016. Scientific Reasoning Ability Of Prospective Students Teacher in Excellent Program of Mathematics and Science Teacher Education in University of Mataram. JPII 5 (1).

Karplus, Robert. 1977. Science Teaching and The Development of Reasoning. Journal of Reasearch in Science Teaching University of California. VOL. 14, NO. 2, PP. 169-175.

Muller, Ulrich. 1999. Developmental Sequences in Class Reasoning and Propositional Reasoning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan No 21 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Isi Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan No 64 Tahun 2013 Tentang Standar Isi Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.

Sutarno. 2014. Profil Penalaran Ilmiah (Scientific Reasoning) Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Bengkulu Tahun Akademik 2013/2014. PROSIDING Semirata 2014 Fakultas MIPA IPB ISBN: 978-602-70491-09.

Published

2024-01-23

How to Cite

Fadlilah, D. R., Fauziah, A. S., & Miranto, S. (2024). Survei tingkat penalaran ilmiah peserta didik se-SMA Negeri Tangerang Selatan. Academy of Education Journal, 15(1), 516–522. https://doi.org/10.47200/aoej.v15i1.2236