Pertanggung jawaban pidana terhadap pelaku main hakim sendiri (Eigenrichting) putusan nomor: 194/Pid.B/2022/PN Unaha
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47200/aoej.v15i1.2200Keywords:
Liability, Criminal, EigenrichtingAbstract
Vigilantism (eigenrichting) is the act of punishing another person without going through the applicable legal process. This action can be categorised as a criminal offence, because it is contrary to the provisions of Article 1 of the Criminal Code which states that every person is prohibited from committing acts prohibited by law. The purpose of this study is to determine the concept of the criminal offence of vigilantism (eigenrichting) according to positive criminal law in Indonesia as well as to know and understand the form of criminal liability for the perpetrators of vigilantism (eigenrichting). This research uses normative-empirical legal research methods. The results showed that the concept of vigilantism (eigenrichting) according to positive criminal law in Indonesia that has been applied by the Public Prosecutor at the Konawe District Prosecutor's Office is Article 170 of the Criminal Code on Robbery, Article 338 of the Criminal Code on Murder, and Article 351 of the Criminal Code on Maltreatment. Criminal responsibility for the perpetrators of vigilantism (eigenrichting) in Decision Number: 194/Pid.B/2022/PN, the perpetrators are responsible for their actions based on their position and the form of their actions. The Panel of Judges applied Article 55 Paragraph (1) to 1 of the Criminal Code which regulates the position of the perpetrator in the participation of a criminal offence declared as a pleger (perpetrator) by the Panel of Judges of the Unaha District Court.
Downloads
References
Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung. (2022). Putusan PN UNAAHA Tahun 2022. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/beranda.html
Hamzah, A. (2008). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Perpustakaan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan. https://perpustakaan.mahkamahagung.go.id/slims/pn-jakartaselatan/index.php?p=show_detail&id=1023
Hamzah, A. (2009). Delik-delik tertentu (speciale delicten) di dalam KUHP. Open Library. https://openlibrary.org/books/OL24004513M/Delik-delik_tertentu_(speciale_delicten)_di_dalam_KUHP
Kristanto, K. (2017). Perbuatan Eigen Righting (Main Hakim Sendiri) dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana. Morality: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(2), 207–222.
Marzuki, P. M. (2019). Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi. Prenamedia Group.
Mertokusumo, S. (2010). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia,.
Moeljatno. (2008). Asas- asas Hukum Pidana. ANZDOC. https://adoc.pub/asas-asas-hukum-pidana.html
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (1999). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 Tentang Hak Asasi Manusia. Lembaran Negara 1999/ No. 165, TLN NO. 3886, LL SETNEG : Hlm 29, 39, 2.
Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2023). Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Direktorat Utama Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Hukum Pemeriksaan Keuangan Negara Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan, 16100, 1–345.
Undang-Undang Dasar, 1945. (1945). Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Warga dan Negara, 1–166.
WELLY, S. K. (2015). Street justice masyarakat terhadap pelaku tindak pidana pencurian di KOTA pontianak. Jurnal Hukum Prodi Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Untan (Jurnal Mahasiswa S1 Fakultas Hukum) Universitas Tanjungpura, 3(2).
Zilvia, R., & Haryadi, H. (2020). Disparitas Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Kasus Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law, 1(1), 96–109.
