Model Assessment of, for dan as Learning Terpadu dalam Mata Kuliah Reading Bahasa Inggris

Agung Prihantoro

doi:10.47200/jnajpm.v7i2.1155

Agung Prihantoro Universitas Cokroaminoto Yogyakarta Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.47200/jnajpm.v7i2.1155

Keywords: assessment of learning, assessment for learning, assessment as learning, reading, integrated

Abstract

The research aim develops an integrated model of assessment of learning (AoL), assessment for learning (AfL) and assessment as learning (AaL) in English language reading subject of private Islamic universities in the Yogyakarta special province. The research methodology is Borg and Gall’s research and development (R & D). The respondents are students of the Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Masjid Syuhada (STAIMS) Yogyakarta dan of the Islam Faculty of the Yogyakarta Cokroaminoto University. The results are that the model increases learning outcomes of the English language reading subject in STAIMS Yogyakarta in 2019 dan in the Islam Faculty of the Yogyakarta Cokroaminoto University in 2021, but decreases them in the Islam Faculty of the Yogyakarta Cokroaminoto University in 2019. The model needs to revise again and test for more respondents of more than two private Islam universities with being based on right learning theories. However, the model can be applied to maximize the achievement of learning outcome of the English reading subject.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chong, Sin Wang. 2018. “Three Paradigms of Classroom Assessment: Implications for Written Feedback Research.” Language Assessment Quarterly 15(4):330–47. doi: 10.1080/15434303.2017.1405423.

Earl, L., and S. Katz. 2006. Rethinking Classroom Assessment with Purpose in Mind.

Efriana, Leli. 2021. “Problems of Online Learning during Covid-19 Pandemic in EFL Classroom and the Solution.” JELITA 2(1):38—47.

Gustiani, Sri. 2019. “Research and Development (R&D) Method as a Model Design in Educational Research and Its Alternatives.” Holistics Journal 11(2):12—22.

Herrington, Jan, and Ron Oliver. 2000. “An Instructional Design Framework for Authentic Learning Environments.” Educational Technology Research and Development 48(3):23–48. doi: 10.1007/BF02319856.

Jang, Eunice Eunhee, Maggie Dunlop, Gina Park, and Edith H. Van Der Boom. 2015. “How Do Young Students with Different Profiles of Reading Skill Mastery , Perceived Ability , and Goal Orientation Respond to Holistic Diagnostic Feedback ?” doi: 10.1177/0265532215570924.

Nelson, Robert, and Phillip Dawson. 2014. “A Contribution to the History of Assessment: How a Conversation Simulator Redeems Socratic Method.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 39(2):195–204. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2013.798394.

Phillips, Deborah. 2001. Longman Complete Course for the TOEFL Test Preparation for the Computer and Paper Tests. White Plains: Pearson Education.

Prihantoro, Agung. 2021a. “Kegagalan Asesmen Autentik Pada Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Di Sekolah Dasar Dan Menengah.” Ulumuddin: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman 11(1):20–54.

Prihantoro, Agung. 2021b. “Tiga Paradigma Evaluasi Pendidikan: Sebuah Peta Perkembangan.” Academy of Educationa Journal 12(1):22–38.

Prihantoro, Agung, and Toto Hermawan. 2021. “Success and Failure of English-as-a-Foreign-Language Lecturers in Applying the Assessment as Learning in Higher Education.” International Journal of Educational Spectrum 3(2):131–49. doi: 10.47806/ijesacademic.896661.

Rizal, Syamsul. 2019. “Desain Pengembangan Bahan Ajar English for Spesific Purpose Berbasis Study Islam Dalam Matakuliah Bahasa Inggris Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam.” Nuansa 12(1). doi: 10.29300/nuansa.v12i1.2110.

Wardah, Wardah. 2016. “Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris Di Perguruan Tinggi Islam Dalam Konteks Esp (English For Spesific Purpose).” Al-Hikmah 10(2):205–18. doi: 10.24260/al-hikmah.v10i2.618.