Introduction of TPACK in Mathematics Education Realm
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47200/intersections.v5i2.606Keywords:
TPACK framework, ICT in education, technological knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, content knowledgeAbstract
Mathematics education is one of the fields that agrees about the importance of integrating technologies into instructional activities in the classroom. However, only understanding technologies does not full fill the criteria of effective teachers, they have to be prepared and grasp the ideas of combining technologies, pedagogical, and content knowledge. This present study is a literature review which aimed at answering two mains questions namely, what is the TPACK framework and how does it influence our education system. Data were collected from articles related to technologies, ICT, and TPACK from thematic journals. The results found that TPACK is a well-known theoretical approach studying the pre-service teachers’ use of ICT. TPACK is accepted as an important framework for defining how well teachers integrate technologies in their classroom. TPACK model shows an effective way of thinking about integrating technologies along with pedagogies, and content knowledge. It has been developed for twenty-first century skills and used as a framework for developing teachers’ readiness toward the twenty-first century skills.
References
Alayyar, G. M., Fisser, P., & Voogt, J. (2012). Developing technological pedagogical content
knowledge in pre-service science teachers: Support from blended learning.
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(8), 1298-1316. Retrieved from
https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.773
Baran, E., Chuang, H.-H., & Thompson, A. (2011). TPACK: An emerging research and development tool for teacher educators. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(4), 370-377.
Davis, N. E. (2010). Technology in Preservice Teacher Education. In P. Peterson, E. Baker & B. McGaw, (Editors). International Encyclopedia of Education, volume 8, pp. 217-221. Oxford: Elsevier.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Free Press.
Drijvers, P. (2012). Digital technology in mathematical education: Why it works (or doesn´t). Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education. Seoul, Korea.
Doering, A., Hughes, J., & Huffman, D. (2003). Preservice teachers: Are we thinking with technology? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(3), 342-361
Dwyer, D. C., Ringstaff, C., & Sandholtz, J. (1990). The evolution of teachers’ instructional beliefs and practices in high access-to technology classrooms. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of Educational Research Association, Boston.
Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first-and-second -order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61.
Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25-39.
Harris, J., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393-416.
Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252
Hughes, J. (2005). The role of teacher knowledge and learning experiences in forming technology-integrated pedagogy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2), 277-302.
Kay, R. H. (2006). Evaluating strategies used to incorporate technology into pre-service education: a review of the literature. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(4), 383–408.
Kim, C., Kim, M. K., Lee, C., Spector, J. M., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 76-85.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 60–70.
Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), The handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 3-29). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131–152.
Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework, In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 101–111). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_9.
Landry, G. A. (2010). Creating and Validating an Instrument to Measure Middle School Mathematics Teathers' Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). Tennessee: University of Tennessee.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. The Teachers College Records, 108(6), 1017-1054.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2008). The role of technology in the teaching and learning of mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.nctm.org/ uploadedFiles/About_NCTM/Position_Statements/Technology%20final.pdf at 2013 22/4
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2014). Principle to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Petko, D., Prasse, D., & Cantieni, A. (2018). The interplay of school readiness and teacher readiness for educational technology integration: A structural equation model. Computers in the Schools, 35(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2018.1428007
Polly, D., & Brantley-Dias, L. (2009). TPACK: Where do we go now? TechTrends, 53(5), 46-47. doi: 10.1007/s11528-009-0324-4
Säljö, R. (2010). Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning: technologies, social memory and the performative nature of learning. Journal of computer assisted learning.
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational
Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
Smith, R. C., Kim, S., & McIntyre, L. (2016). Relationship between prospective middle grades mathematics teachers’ beliefs and TPACK. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, DOI: 10.1080/14926156.2016.1189624.
Swars, S. L., Smith, S. Z., Smith, M. E., & Hart, L. C. (2009). A longitudinal study of effects of a developmental teacher preparation program on elementary prospective teachers’ mathematical beliefs. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. 12(1), 47-66.
The Horizon report. (2011). Retrieved from http://wp.nmc.org/horizon2010/ at 2011
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14, 207-222. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375.
Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 26, 3.
Willermark, S. (2018). Technological pedagogical and content knowledge: A review of empirical studies published from 2011 to 2016. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(3), 315–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117713114.
Yildrim, S. (2000). Effects of an Educational Computing Course on Pre-Service and In-Service Teachers: A Discussion and Analysis of Attitudes and Use. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(4), 479-495
