PELATIHAN ASESMEN AUTENTIK BAGI GURU SEKOLAH DASAR MUHAMMADIYAH PAKEM SLEMAN

  • Agung Ptihantoro Universitas Cokroaminoto Yogyakarta
  • Taufik Nugroho Universitas Cokroaminoto Yogyakarta
  • Muhammad Nasrudin Universitas Cokroaminoto Yogyakarta
  • Ridwan Nur Hidayat Universitas Cokroaminoto Yogyakarta
  • Aprilia Aprilia Universitas Cokroaminoto Yogyakarta
Keywords: authenctic assessment, Pakem Muhammadiyah Elementary School, teachers’ knowledge

Abstract

A kind of learning assessments that has not been done by the teachers of Pakem Muhammadiyah Elementary School, Sleman, Special Province of Yogyakarta is authentic assessment. Therefore, training and workshop of authentic assessment were held for the six teachers of 1—6 grades. Before and after the training and workshop were held, the teachers were pretested and postested. The training and workshop were held in forms of lecturing, discussing and designing authentic assessment. Scores of the pretest and postest were analyzed with Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test. Ho is the training and workshop do not improve the teachers’ knowledge on authentic assessment. Ho is accepted if P-value < 0,05 with α = 0,05. Because of P-value < α, 0,00027 < 0,05, Ho is accepted. It concludes that the training and workshop do not improve the teachers’ knowledge on authentic assessment. It may be caused of limited durance of the training and workshop.

References

Archer, M., Morley, D. A., & Souppez, J.-B. R. G. (2021). Real World Learning and Authentic Assessment. In Applied Pedagogies for Higher Education Real World Learning and Innovation across the Curriculum. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46951-1 © The

Ashford-Rowe, K., Herrington, J., & Brown, C. (2014). Establishing the critical elements that determine authentic assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(2), 205–222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.819566

Herrington, J., & Herrington, A. (2006). Authentic conditions for authentic assessment: Aligning task and assessment. Proceedings of the 29th HERDSA Annual Conference.

Herrington, Jan, & Herrington, A. (1998). Authentic assessment and multimedia: How university students respond to a model of authentic assessment. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 21(1), 305–322. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436980170304

Herrington, Jan, & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(3), 23–48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02319856

Litchfield, B. C., & Dempsey, J. V. (2015). Authentic Assessment of Knowledge, Skills, and Attitudes. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20130

Mueller, J. (2016). Authentic Assessment Toolbox. http://jfmueller.faculty.noctrl.edu/toolbox/index.htm

Prihantoro, A. (2021). Kegagalan Asesmen Autentik pada Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam di Sekolah Dasar dan Menengah. Ulumuddin: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 11(1), 20–54. https://jurnal.ucy.ac.id/index.php/agama_islam/article/view/688

Prihantoro, A. (2023). Wawancara dengan Wakil Kepala Sekolah SD Muhammadiyah Pakem Sleman DIY (p. 3).

Published
2024-06-30
How to Cite
PtihantoroA., NugrohoT., NasrudinM., HidayatR., & ApriliaA. (2024). PELATIHAN ASESMEN AUTENTIK BAGI GURU SEKOLAH DASAR MUHAMMADIYAH PAKEM SLEMAN. GEMI, 3(2), 11-17. https://doi.org/10.47200/gemi.v3i2.2410
Section
Articles