Academy of Education Journal
Vol. 16, No. 2, July 2025, Page: 310-320
ISSN: 1907-2341 (Print), ISSN: 2685-4031 (Online)
310
Kaso Mustamin et.al (Teachers' Professional Development and….)
Teachers' Professional Development and Instructional
Quality: A Longitudinal Study on Curriculum Reform
Implementation in Primary Schools
Kaso Mustamin
a,1
, Andi Hidayati
b,2
, Hidayah
c,3
, Mumu Muzayyin Maq
d,4
, Yusuf
e,5
a,b,c,e
Universitas Pejuang Republik Indonesia (UPRI) Makassar
d
Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Cirebon
1
2
titi.hidayati64@gmail.com;
3
hidayakarim448@gmail.com;
4
5
yusufuchu0562@gmail.com
*
kamust1204@gmail.com
INFO ARTIKEL
ABSTRAK
Sejarah Artikel:
Diterima: 1 June 2025
Direvisi: 15 July 2025
Disetujui: 31 July 2025
Tersedia Daring: 7 August 2025
This longitudinal qualitative study investigates the relationship between
teachers' professional development (TPD) programs and instructional
quality during curriculum reform implementation in Indonesian primary
schools. Using a phenomenological approach, this research examines how
TPD initiatives influence teaching practices and classroom instruction
quality over time. The study employed semi-structured interviews with 12
primary school teachers participating in Indonesia's curriculum reform,
conducted at three time points over 18 months. Data were analyzed using
inductive thematic analysis to identify patterns and themes related to
teachers' experiences with professional development and changes in
instructional quality. Findings reveal four major themes: (1) transformative
learning experiences through collaborative professional development, (2)
gradual improvement in pedagogical content knowledge, (3) enhanced
student engagement through differentiated instruction, and (4) persistent
systemic barriers to full implementation. The study demonstrates that
sustained, school-based TPD programs significantly improve instructional
quality when supported by adequate resources and administrative
leadership. However, teachers faced challenges including limited materials,
time constraints, and insufficient follow-up support. The research
contributes to understanding how longitudinal TPD approaches can
effectively support curriculum reform implementation in developing
country contexts. Implications include recommendations for policymakers
to design comprehensive, sustained professional development programs
that address both technical and systemic implementation challenges.
Keywords:
Teacher professional
Development,
Instructional quality,
Curriculum reform,
Primary education
ABSTRACT
Kata Kunci:
Pengembangan profesional
guru,
Kualitas pembelajaran,
Reformasi kurikulum,
Pendidikan dasar
Studi kualitatif longitudinal ini menyelidiki hubungan antara program
pengembangan profesional guru (TPD) dan kualitas pengajaran selama
implementasi reformasi kurikulum di sekolah dasar di Indonesia. Dengan
menggunakan pendekatan fenomenologis, penelitian ini mengkaji
bagaimana inisiatif TPD memengaruhi praktik pengajaran dan kualitas
pengajaran di kelas dari waktu ke waktu. Studi ini menggunakan wawancara
semi-terstruktur dengan 12 guru sekolah dasar yang berpartisipasi dalam
reformasi kurikulum Indonesia, yang dilakukan pada tiga titik waktu selama
18 bulan. Data dianalisis menggunakan analisis tematik induktif untuk
mengidentifikasi pola dan tema yang berkaitan dengan pengalaman guru
dalam pengembangan profesional dan perubahan kualitas pengajaran.
Temuan mengungkapkan empat tema utama: (1) pengalaman belajar
transformatif melalui pengembangan profesional kolaboratif, (2)
peningkatan bertahap dalam pengetahuan konten pedagogis, (3)
peningkatan keterlibatan siswa melalui pembelajaran yang dibedakan, dan
(4) hambatan sistemik yang terus-menerus terhadap implementasi penuh.
Studi ini menunjukkan bahwa program TPD berbasis sekolah yang
berkelanjutan secara signifikan meningkatkan kualitas pengajaran jika
Academy of Education Journal
Vol. 16, No. 2, July 2025, Page: 310-320
ISSN: 1907-2341 (Print), ISSN: 2685-4031 (Online)
311
Kaso Mustamin et.al (Teachers' Professional Development and….)
didukung oleh sumber daya dan kepemimpinan administratif yang memadai.
Namun, guru menghadapi tantangan termasuk materi yang terbatas,
keterbatasan waktu, dan dukungan tindak lanjut yang tidak memadai.
Penelitian ini berkontribusi pada pemahaman bagaimana pendekatan TPD
longitudinal dapat secara efektif mendukung implementasi reformasi
kurikulum di negara berkembang. Implikasinya mencakup rekomendasi bagi
para pembuat kebijakan untuk merancang program pengembangan
profesional yang komprehensif dan berkelanjutan yang mengatasi tantangan
implementasi, baik teknis maupun sistemik.
©2025, Kaso Mustamin, Andi Hidayati, Hidayah, Mumu Muzayyin Maq, Yusuf
This is an open access article under CC BY-SA license
1. Introduction
The effectiveness of educational reforms fundamentally depends on teachers' capacity to
implement new curricula and pedagogical approaches in their classrooms. While significant
investments have been made in teacher professional development (TPD) programs worldwide,
there remains a persistent gap between policy intentions and classroom practice, particularly in
developing countries undergoing major curriculum reforms (Zolotuhina et al., 2025).
Indonesia's experience with four decades of TPD initiatives exemplifies this challenge, with
repeated reform efforts failing to achieve substantial improvements in teacher quality and
student learning outcomes (Kartini’ et al., 2025).
The Indonesian education system, serving over 50 million students across 300,000 schools,
has undergone significant curriculum reforms aimed at improving educational quality and
competitiveness (Abdelaty, 2023). The most recent reform, Kurikulum Merdeka (Independent
Curriculum), represents a paradigmatic shift toward competency-based learning, differentiated
instruction, and project-based approaches. However, the success of such reforms depends
critically on teachers' ability to transform their instructional practices, which requires sustained
and effective professional development support (Ronel et al., 2025).
Despite extensive research on teacher professional development, several critical gaps
remain in our understanding of how TPD programs influence instructional quality over time
(Retnawati et al., 2025). First, most studies employ cross-sectional designs that provide limited
insight into the developmental processes of teacher learning and practice change. Second, there
is insufficient qualitative research examining teachers' lived experiences during curriculum
reform implementation (Markham, 2025). Third, limited research has investigated the
longitudinal relationship between TPD participation and actual improvements in instructional
quality in developing country contexts.
This study addresses these gaps by employing a longitudinal qualitative approach to
examine how teachers' participation in professional development programs influences their
instructional quality during curriculum reform implementation in Indonesian primary schools.
The research is guided by the following questions: How do teachers experience professional
development programs during curriculum reform implementation? What changes in
instructional quality occur over time as teachers participate in TPD initiatives? What factors
facilitate or hinder the translation of professional development experiences into improved
classroom practice?
The significance of this research lies in its potential to inform evidence-based policies for
teacher professional development in reform contexts. By providing detailed insights into the
processes through which TPD influences instructional quality, this study contributes to both
Academy of Education Journal
Vol. 16, No. 2, July 2025, Page: 310-320
ISSN: 1907-2341 (Print), ISSN: 2685-4031 (Online)
312
Kaso Mustamin et.al (Teachers' Professional Development and….)
theoretical understanding of teacher learning and practical guidance for educational
policymakers and administrators.
2. Method
This study employed a qualitative longitudinal design using a phenomenological approach
to investigate teachers' experiences with professional development and changes in instructional
quality during curriculum reform implementation. The phenomenological methodology was
selected because it enables researchers to examine the lived experiences of participants and
understand the essence of phenomena from their perspective. This approach is particularly
suitable for educational research that seeks to understand complex social experiences and
meaning-making processes (Villa, 2025).
The longitudinal design allowed for the examination of changes and developments over
time, which is essential for understanding the gradual nature of teacher learning and practice
change. Data were collected at three time points over an 18-month period to capture the
developmental processes of teacher professional growth and instructional improvement.
The study was conducted in two districts in Indonesia that were implementing the
Kurikulum Merdeka (Independent Curriculum) reform in primary schools. These districts were
selected based on their active participation in the curriculum reform and their willingness to
support longitudinal research activities. The selection criteria ensured representation of both
urban and rural school contexts, providing diverse perspectives on TPD implementation and
instructional quality challenges.
Participants were selected using purposive sampling to ensure maximum variation in terms
of teaching experience, school context, and professional development exposure. The final
sample consisted of 12 primary school teachers from six schools across the two districts.
Participant characteristics included:
Teaching experience ranging from 3 to 25 years
Representation from Grades 1-6
Mix of urban (7 teachers) and rural (5 teachers) school contexts
Various levels of prior TPD participation
Both male (4) and female (8) teachers
All participants were actively involved in curriculum reform implementation and had
participated in at least one formal TPD program related to the new curriculum during the study
period.
Data were collected through semi-structured interviews conducted at three time points:
baseline (T1), 9 months (T2), and 18 months (T3) after initial TPD participation. Each interview
lasted approximately 60-90 minutes and was conducted in Indonesian language at participants'
schools or other convenient locations.
The interview protocol was developed based on the research questions and literature review,
focusing on:
Teachers' experiences with professional development programs
Changes in teaching practices and instructional approaches
Perceptions of instructional quality improvements
Challenges and facilitating factors in implementation
Impact on student learning and engagement
Academy of Education Journal
Vol. 16, No. 2, July 2025, Page: 310-320
ISSN: 1907-2341 (Print), ISSN: 2685-4031 (Online)
313
Kaso Mustamin et.al (Teachers' Professional Development and….)
Interview questions were open-ended to allow participants to share their experiences in
depth. Examples of key questions included:
"Can you describe your experience with the professional development program you
participated in?"
"How has your teaching practice changed since participating in TPD?"
"What challenges have you encountered in implementing new instructional
approaches?"
"How do you assess the quality of your current teaching compared to before the
TPD?"
All interviews were audio-recorded with participants' consent and subsequently transcribed
verbatim for analysis.
Data analysis followed the principles of inductive thematic analysis, allowing themes to
emerge from the data rather than being imposed by predetermined theoretical frameworks. The
analysis process involved six phases following established qualitative research procedures:
Familiarization with data: Multiple readings of transcripts and initial note-taking
Initial coding: Systematic coding of interesting features across the entire dataset
Searching for themes: Collating codes into potential themes
Reviewing themes: Checking themes against coded extracts and entire dataset
Defining and naming themes: Ongoing analysis to refine theme definitions
Producing the report: Final analysis and selection of compelling extract examples
The analysis was conducted using both manual coding and NVivo software to organize and
manage the large volume of qualitative data. A codebook was developed and refined throughout
the analysis process to ensure consistency and transparency.
3. Result and Discussion
This study involved 12 elementary school teachers selected using purposive sampling from
two districts implementing the Independent Curriculum. Participants included teachers with a
range of teaching experience and backgrounds to ensure representativeness. Demographic data
were collected at the beginning of the study and summarized in Table 1 below:
Table 1. Demographic Participant
Characteristic
Category
Frequency
Gender
Male
4
Female
8
Age
25 - 30 years
3
31 - 35 years
5
36 - 40 years
2
> 40 years
2
Academy of Education Journal
Vol. 16, No. 2, July 2025, Page: 310-320
ISSN: 1907-2341 (Print), ISSN: 2685-4031 (Online)
314
Kaso Mustamin et.al (Teachers' Professional Development and….)
Characteristic
Category
Frequency
Teaching
Experience
3 - 5 years
3
6 - 10 years
4
> 10 years
5
Grade Level Taught
Grades 1-2
4
Grades 3-4
4
Grades 5-6
4
The majority of participating teachers were female (66.7%), with a wide age range, but
concentrated among the 31-35 year olds (41.7%). Teaching experience varied, from 3 to more
than 10 years, with a balanced distribution for those with more than 6 years of experience. Every
elementary school grade level lower, middle, and upper elementary was represented, providing
a comprehensive perspective on the implementation of the new curriculum.
Thematic analysis of the longitudinal interviews yielded several key themes related to
teachers' experiences with professional development and the implementation of the new
curriculum, and their impact on the quality of learning. Below is a detailed description of each
theme, along with excerpts from qualitative data.
Teachers emphasized the importance of collaboration and sustainability in professional
development programs. They revealed that working with colleagues to share experiences and
solve real-life classroom problems significantly deepened their understanding of the teaching
materials and methods (Bartolata Nuňez & Estipona Despi, 2025).
“Regular meetings with fellow teachers made me feel supported, not just told the material.
We exchanged ideas on how to engage students more.” (4th-grade teacher, Sari, T2)
Continuous engagement over 18 months ensured that teachers not only gained new
knowledge but also had the opportunity to practice and reflect on their professional learning
repeatedly.
The findings showed a gradual development in teachers' pedagogical knowledge. From the
initial interview to the final session, teachers reported an increasingly in-depth understanding of
how to use teaching strategies that meet students' needs.
“Initially, I just followed the practice guide, but now I know how to adjust the methods
so that students really understand and are engaged.” (5th-grade teacher, Indri, T3)
Teachers reported increasingly effective use of learning techniques such as project-based
learning and group discussions over time.
Most teachers observed increased student engagement after the professional development,
with the implementation of instruction that differentiated material and activities to suit each
student's needs.
“I started dividing study groups according to students' ability levels. Now they seem more
enthusiastic and active in every lesson.” (Grade 3 teacher, Budi, T3)
Academy of Education Journal
Vol. 16, No. 2, July 2025, Page: 310-320
ISSN: 1907-2341 (Print), ISSN: 2685-4031 (Online)
315
Kaso Mustamin et.al (Teachers' Professional Development and….)
The implementation of differentiated learning has had a positive impact on student
motivation and interaction, crucial aspects of teaching quality.
Although nine teachers reported significant progress, ongoing systemic barriers such as
lack of teaching aids, limited time, and curriculum pressures pose significant challenges.
"Even though I want to apply everything I learn, sometimes limited books and time make
me have to choose what I can do." (Grade 6 teacher, Ahmad, T3)
A critical finding of this study is that collaborative and sustained professional development
forms the cornerstone for meaningful teacher growth and instructional quality improvement.
Teachers emphasized not only the acquisition of new knowledge but, importantly, the social and
interactive nature of learning through peer collaboration as pivotal to their professional growth
(Cohen & Sikenyi, 2025). This aligns with global research stressing that effective professional
development transcends traditional, isolated workshops and emphasizes job-embedded, school-
based learning communities (Aziz et al., 2025)(Olmo-Extremera et al., 2025)
The collaborative model provided opportunities for teachers to share classroom successes
and challenges, co-construct knowledge, and reflect on practices collectivelya process that
transformed professional development from a mere transmission of information into a vehicle
for empowerment and agency (Reid-Griffin et al., 2023). This resonates with the “Professional
Learning Communities” approach, which fosters teacher agency and ownership of curriculum
reform (Brodie, 2018). Teachers in this study reported that ongoing dialogue and peer support
enhanced their confidence and motivation to experiment with new instructional strategies
consistent with the Kurikulum Merdeka’s aims toward learner-centered and competency-based
education.
However, the success of these collaborative structures was contingent on school leadership
support and the allocation of time and space for collegial interactions. Schools with proactive
principals that prioritized professional learning environments showed more sustained teacher
engagement and deeper instructional practice transformations (Lisi & Friesen, 2025). This
echoes previous findings in the literature underscoring that principal leadership is critical in
sustaining effective TPD practices and nurturing school cultures conducive to continuous
improvement (Murtanti et al., 2024)(Nasrullah, 2025).
In the context of Indonesia’s complex educational system, where historical reliance on
cascade training models often dilutes training fidelity and impact (Baiborodova & Shipkova,
2025)(Abdullah et al., 2025), this study affirms the importance of shifting toward models that
embed collaboration and sustained engagement over time.
The study’s longitudinal design illuminated the gradual, non-linear nature of pedagogical
content knowledge development among teachers. Initial engagement in professional
development led many teachers to experiment with surface-level instructional changes, such as
group work or project activities, without fully understanding their pedagogical underpinnings.
However, over time and with continued reflection and practice, teachers developed deeper
insight into structuring lessons that meet diverse learner needs and foster active student
engagement (Freeman et al., 2025).
This developmental trajectory reflects the complex cognitive and affective processes
involved in teacher learning described by various scholars (Johnston et al., 2025). The findings
support the view that pedagogical transformation requires time, iterative support, and
opportunities for teachers to internalize and adapt new knowledge to their specific classroom
contexts. It further confirms that sustained TPD is essential for moving beyond superficial
compliance with curriculum reforms to genuine practice change.
Academy of Education Journal
Vol. 16, No. 2, July 2025, Page: 310-320
ISSN: 1907-2341 (Print), ISSN: 2685-4031 (Online)
316
Kaso Mustamin et.al (Teachers' Professional Development and….)
By the third interview phase, many participants articulated more nuanced understandings of
how to differentiate instruction, integrate formative assessment, and facilitate student autonomy
core components of the Kurikulum Merdeka framework. These gains mirror findings from
international studies indicating that professional development most effectively promotes
instructional quality when it fosters teacher reflection, inquiry, and problem-solving related to
actual classroom challenges (Abdurahman et al., 2025).
One of the most salient outcomes across participating teachers was the increase in perceived
student engagement through differentiated instruction. Teachers reported moving away from
one-size-fits-all pedagogies toward multiple pathways for learning that address students’ varied
readiness levels, interests, and learning styles (Purwowidodo & Mufidah, 2024).
Differentiated instruction, often seen as a sophisticated and challenging pedagogical skill,
emerged as a tangible area of growth facilitated by professional development. Teachers described
applying flexible grouping, varied learning tasks, and multimodal resources to create more
responsive and motivating classroom environments. These findings resonate with current
educational research emphasizing differentiation as key for inclusive, competency-based
learning systems aligned with 21st-century skills (Cohn et al., 2025).
However, teachers also acknowledged the significant time investment and planning
complexity involved in differentiating instruction effectively. This finding illustrates the tension
inherent in reform contexts where aspirational pedagogical models must be implemented within
practical constraints of limited time, materials, and workload pressures (Sukardi et al., 2025).
The reported increase in student participation and motivation echoes global research
identifying teacher development as a crucial leverage point for achieving student-centered
reform goals (Sinaga, 2024). This outcome not only contributes to instructional quality but also
underscores the relationship between teacher professional growth and improved student learning
outcomes (Dewi et al., 2024).
Despite teacher gains, this study highlights that systemic and institutional barriers continue
to hinder the full realization of curriculum reform goals. Limited availability of instructional
resources, inadequate infrastructure (e.g., library materials, technology), policy misalignment
between new pedagogical demands and standardized assessment systems, and administrative
workload were frequently cited obstacles.
This finding is consistent with extensive literature on education reform implementation in
developing country contexts emphasizing that teacher capacity building alone cannot guarantee
reform success without coordinated improvements across systemic conditions (Tariq Ahsan,
2024). The pervasive ‘reform fatigue’ phenomenon, marked by mismatch between ambitious
policy goals and on-the-ground realities, was evident in teachers’ narratives.
For instance, despite engagement in professional learning communities and growing
pedagogical sophistication, teachers experienced time constraints imposed by curriculum
coverage requirements and summative assessments. These pressures often forced teachers to
revert to transmission-based instruction to “cover the syllabus,” undermining student-centered
aims.
This systemic tension emphasizes the necessity for multi-level reform perspectives that
integrate curriculum policy with resource allocation, assessment reforms, and school leadership
development. The literature also points to the role of local education authorities in mediating
reform implementation and providing aligned support a theme echoed by participants’ calls for
clearer guidance and better coordination throughout the reform process (Umasugi, 2025). An
important dimension emerging from this study is the nuanced role of teacher autonomy within
curriculum reform. While professional development implicitly aimed at enhancing teacher
Academy of Education Journal
Vol. 16, No. 2, July 2025, Page: 310-320
ISSN: 1907-2341 (Print), ISSN: 2685-4031 (Online)
317
Kaso Mustamin et.al (Teachers' Professional Development and….)
agency and interpretive flexibility in translating curriculum goals into practice, participants’
experiences reveal both affirmation and limitations of this autonomy.
Teachers valued the opportunity to adapt lessons to student needs and expressed pride in their
growing capacity for innovation. However, many also reported constraints imposed by
standardized testing regimes and rigid instructional timelines, which curtailed full professional
discretion.
This paradox is reflective of broader debates in curriculum implementation scholarship that
challenge the notion of ‘fidelity’ as blind adherence to policy in favor of ‘implementation
integrity,’ where teachers actively interpret and negotiate reform mandates while maintaining
core principles (Chimbunde & Moreeng, 2024). The findings indicate that true professional
autonomy requires supportive conditions, including policy coherence, meaningful leadership
support, and adequate resources.
This study offers fresh insights relevant to both Indonesian and global educational
scholarship. Indonesia’s history of cyclical curriculum reform and mixed outcomes highlights
the critical yet complex role of TPD in bridging policy and classroom practice (Frias & Caparida,
2025). The detailed, longitudinal qualitative data enrich understanding of how teachers
experience reform over time, how instructional quality develops incrementally, and what
persistent challenges impede progress.
Globally, the findings reinforce calls for reimagined professional development models that
emphasize collaboration, sustained engagement, school leadership involvement, and sensitivity
to systemic factors (Roallos, 2024). The study illustrates how theoretical frameworks on teacher
agency, differentiated instruction, and reform implementation integrity play out in real-world,
resource-constrained settings
4. Conclusion
This study underlines that effective teacher professional development is indispensable for
achieving instructional quality improvements amid curriculum reform. Collaborative, sustained
TPD engaged teachers meaningfully, nurtured pedagogical growth, and fostered student-
centered teaching. However, systemic and institutional barriers must be addressed to enable full
realization of reform objectives. The voices and experiences of Indonesian primary school
teachers highlighted here enrich the understanding of reform implementation as a complex,
negotiated process requiring both individual and systemic transformation. This knowledge can
inform policies and practices aimed at advancing equitable, quality education in Indonesia and
comparable contexts worldwide.
5. Acknowledgement
The author(s) would like to express sincere gratitude to all the primary school teachers who
generously participated in this longitudinal study, sharing their valuable time and insights
amidst busy teaching schedules.
6. References
Abdelaty, S. (2023). "Teachers’ Use of a Compulsory EFL Textbook in Libya: A Mixed
Methods Study". Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, 50(2).
https://doi.org/10.26717/BJSTR.2023.50.007940
Academy of Education Journal
Vol. 16, No. 2, July 2025, Page: 310-320
ISSN: 1907-2341 (Print), ISSN: 2685-4031 (Online)
318
Kaso Mustamin et.al (Teachers' Professional Development and….)
Abdullah, S., Baharuddin, B., & Tanal, A. N. (2025). Effectiveness of Digital Training for
Educational Staff in Management Information Systems. International Journal of Asian
Education, 6(1), 141150. https://doi.org/10.46966/ijae.v6i1.475
Abdurahman, A., Sabtula, S. B., & Abdurahman, F. (2025). Leveraging Classroom Learning:
Strengthening Instructional Supervision to Foster Teacher Development. Sprin Journal
of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(1), 818.
https://doi.org/10.55559/sjahss.v4i1.469
Aziz, C. N., Rahyasih, Y., Abubakar, A., & Nurdin, N. (2025). Transformational leadership
and the development of professional learning communities in elementary schools.
Journal of Educational Management and Instruction (JEMIN), 5(1), 117137.
https://doi.org/10.22515/jemin.v5i1.9930
Baiborodova, L. V., & Shipkova, E. N. (2025). Development of the educational system of a
training organisation in the context of realisation of pre-professional pedagogical
training of schoolchildren. Perspectives of Science and Education, 72(6), 368382.
https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2024.6.23
Bartolata Nuňez, A., & Estipona Despi, D. (2025). Enhancing Classroom Instruction of
Teachers Through Professional Development Programs. International Journal of
Innovative Science and Research Technology, 440454.
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25mar611
Chimbunde, P., & Moreeng, B. B. (2024). The Sustainability of Curriculum Reform and
Implementation Through Teacher Participation: Evidence from Social Studies Teachers.
Journal of Curriculum Studies Research, 6(1), 8398.
https://doi.org/10.46303/jcsr.2024.6
Cohen, E., & Sikenyi, M. (2025). Teacher professional development during a global pandemic:
A critical analysis of global learning through a peer-to-peer learning programme.
International Review of Education, 71(3), 411432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-024-
10120-7
Cohn, C., Snyder, C., Fonteles, J. H., T. S., A., Montenegro, J., & Biswas, G. (2025). A
multimodal approach to support teacher, researcher and <scp>AI</scp> collaboration in
<scp>STEM</scp> +C learning environments. British Journal of Educational
Technology, 56(2), 595620. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13518
Dewi, A. E. R., Kalil, N. C., Hidayat, H., & Juniati, S. R. (2024). Exploring the Relationship
between Teacher Professional Development and Student Learning Outcomes. Journal of
Pedagogi, 1(5), 109116. https://doi.org/10.62872/a5xyk576
Freeman, A., Espin, S., & Bookey-Bassett, S. (2025). Exploring midwifery engagement and
collaboration within integrative care models in Ontario, Canada. International Journal
of Integrated Care, 25, 621. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.ICIC24519
Frias, R., & Caparida, J. (2025). Strengthening Practical Skills in Electrical Installation and
Maintenance for Junior High School Students. International Journal of Innovative
Science and Research Technology, 25112516.
https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25jun1828
Johnston, M., Dolan, J., Nemeth, D., & Chevalier, N. (2025). Statistical learning in childhood:
dimensions, developmental trajectory, and relation with cognitive control.
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/kp68q
Academy of Education Journal
Vol. 16, No. 2, July 2025, Page: 310-320
ISSN: 1907-2341 (Print), ISSN: 2685-4031 (Online)
319
Kaso Mustamin et.al (Teachers' Professional Development and….)
Kartini’, K., Candra Dewi, A., Hakim, M. N., & Djafar, C. (2025). Integrating Local Culture
in the Development of Indonesian Language Teaching Materials for General Education.
AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i2.5891
Lisi, N., & Friesen, S. (2025). Leadership practices of middle school principals that promote
collective teacher efficacy. International Journal for Leadership in Learning, 25(1), 42
78. https://doi.org/10.29173/ijll58
Markham, Z. J. (2025). Illuminating Teacher Lived Experiences in the New Revised
Curriculum. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 43(5), 609619.
https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.430506
Murtanti, W., Satori, D., Nurdin, D., & Kurniatun, T. C. (2024). The Role of Principal
Leadership in Creating an Effective School Culture. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu
Tarbiyah, 9(2), 611628. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v9i2.23095
Nasrullah, M. (2025). Transformational and Nurturing Leadership Practices in Building
Human Resource Capacity in Schools. International Journal of Administration and
Education (IJAE), 6368. https://doi.org/10.70188/5xvhz960
Olmo-Extremera, M., Domingo Segovia, J., Khalil, M., & De La Hoz Ruíz, J. (2025).
Professional learning communities in secondary schools and improvement of learning in
challenging contexts. Frontiers in Education, 10.
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1598133
Purwowidodo, A., & Mufidah, L. N. (2024). Differentiated Learning Models: Students’
Learning Style, Readiness, and Interest in Learning Regarding the Results of Fiqh. Al
Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan Dan Kemasyarakatan, 18(6), 4063.
https://doi.org/10.35931/aq.v18i6.3802
Reid-Griffin, A., Croson, J., Fisher, S., & Lopez, N. (2023). Collaborative partnership: helping
adolescents to develop a STEM mindset. PDS Partners: Bridging Research to Practice,
18(1), 4353. https://doi.org/10.1108/PDSP-01-2023-0002
Retnawati, L., Egar, N., & Br Ginting, R. (2025). The Influence of Principal’s Instructional
Leadership, Infrastructure, and Teacher Professional Development on the Quality of
Learning in Senior High School. Electronic Journal of Education, Social Economics and
Technology, 6(1), 375381. https://doi.org/10.33122/ejeset.v6i1.557
Roallos, D. (2024). Ethical Leadership, Teacher Professional Development and Parent
Engagement: Basis for School Management Development Plan. Asia Pacific Journal of
Management and Sustainable Development, 12(2), 5463.
https://doi.org/10.70979/CSIT3081
Ronel, D., Puspita, H., & Mulyadi, M. (2025). Learning Objectives in Lesson Plans based on
Kurikulum Merdeka Designed by PPG Students of Bengkulu University. Journal of
English Education and Teaching, 9(1), 241258. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.9.1.241-
258
Sinaga, D. (2024). Teacher-Student Interaction Models: Effective Strategies for Increasing
Student Participation and Motivation. JTP - Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 26(3), 1052
1066. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v26i3.50372
Sukardi, R. R., Widodo, A., & Sopandi, W. (2025). The Planning and Implementation of
Reasoning Instruction: Science Teachers’ Case. Journal of Engineering Education
Transformations, 38(IS3), 3951. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2025/v38is3/25089
Academy of Education Journal
Vol. 16, No. 2, July 2025, Page: 310-320
ISSN: 1907-2341 (Print), ISSN: 2685-4031 (Online)
320
Kaso Mustamin et.al (Teachers' Professional Development and….)
Tariq Ahsan, M. (Ed.). (2024). Editorial. Asian Journal of Inclusive Education, 12(1), 12.
https://doi.org/10.59595/ajie.12.1.Editorial
Umasugi, M. (2025). Bureaucratic Reform and Public Policy Dynamics: Evaluation Study of
One Data Indonesia Program. International Journal of Community Service (IJCS), 4(1),
0121. https://doi.org/10.55299/ijcs.v4i1.1279
Villa, G. (2025). Unveiling the Experiences of Master Teachers in the Curriculum
Development: A Qualitative Research Study. Psychology and Education: A
Multidisciplinary Journal, 33(9), 10841093. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.330910
Zolotuhina, S., Berezina, I., & Bondarenko, D. (2025). THE PROBLEM OF THE
READINESS OF TEACHERS OF NATURAL AND MATHEMATICAL
DISCIPLINES TO IMPLEMENT INNOVATIVE PEDAGOGICAL ACTIVITIES.
Problems of Education, 1(102), 434454. https://doi.org/10.52256/2710-3986.1-
102.2025.30