Therefore, political communication in this village does not only rely on identity narratives, but
also cross-group dialogue to foster mutual respect and social cohesion.
Informal communication that takes place in social spaces such as recitation, arisan, and
traditional events is very instrumental in spreading ethnic-based political messages. Fauziah and
Prasetyo (2022) revealed that face-to-face communication and community meetings are still the
main effective means of building political solidarity in coastal areas with limited information
technology. Teluk Pulai Village relies on these methods to ensure that political messages are
delivered in a contextualised and personalised manner, thus building trust and strong attachments
between voters and political figures. In addition, nonverbal communication such as the use of
traditional clothing, cultural symbols and traditional rituals become powerful political
instruments to express ethnic identity while communicating the group's political aspirations.
These symbols strengthen the appeal and legitimacy of prospective leaders in the eyes of the
community. The utilisation of nonverbal aspects in political communication shows the depth of
the relationship between culture and politics that is not easily separated at the local level.
In the context of political communication in Teluk Pulai Village, the ethnic aspect is not
only a static identity, but a dynamic symbolic system that continues to develop in accordance
with the social and political interactions that occur. Ethnic identity functions as an interpretative
framework that shapes the way people understand political messages, so effective political
communication must be able to adjust to the values and symbols of local culture attached to
certain ethnic groups. Village Head Johan Simbolon asserts that "prospective leaders who are
able to show respect for ethnic culture and traditions will more easily gain support because
people feel authentically represented." In the local political process, communication is not only
one-way from the leader to the community, but there is dialogue and negotiation of meaning
between political actors and ethnic communities. Traditional leaders, such as Mr Muslim
Nasution, act as mediators who help convey the aspirations of the community while interpreting
political messages to fit the cultural context. This shows that political communication in the
village is participatory and contextualised, not just mass persuasion communication.
Ethnic identity-based political communication is also often manifested in symbolic
practices that are rich in meaning. The use of local languages, traditional clothing, and cultural
rituals in political campaigns are forms of nonverbal communication that have a strong effect in
building emotional closeness between prospective leaders and the community.
However, the dynamics of ethnic-based politics are not free from challenges. The potential
for social fragmentation and identity conflict is a serious issue that must be managed wisely.
Village Head Johan Simbolon recognises that there is a tendency for people to put the interests
of their ethnic groups above the common interest, especially during political campaigns.
Therefore, communication that promotes inclusivity and dialogue between groups is crucial to
maintaining unity. In this case, the role of community and traditional leaders is vital as guardians
of social stability and as facilitators of inter-ethnic dialogue.
Discussion
In addition, informal communications such as community meetings, recitations, and
gotong royong activities are important channels for disseminating political messages based on
ethnic identity. In the modern context, social media and local media have also begun to play a
role in village political communication. However, the community's access to and ability to utilise
information technology is still limited, so personal and traditional communication remains
dominant. The appropriate use of ethnic-based political communication can increase people's
political participation, especially those who previously felt marginalised or underrepresented.
When political messages are packaged in familiar symbols and language, people feel valued and