Penghapusan Unsur Merugikan Keuangan Negara
Sinkronisasi Undang-Undang Tipikor dengan UNCAC
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47200/awtjhpsa.v5i1.3237Keywords:
Corruption Crime, Law, UNCAC, Elements Causing Detriment to State Finances, SynchronizationAbstract
The current Corruption Law still uses the element of "causing loss to state finances" as the main element of the crime, thus creating legal uncertainty and limiting the effectiveness of corruption eradication. This study uses a normative juridical method with a comparative legal approach between the Corruption Law and the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) to analyze the direction of synchronization between the two. The results show that the UNCAC does not require state losses, but rather emphasizes the corrupt act itself, such as abuse of office, bribery, and illicit acquisition of wealth. In conclusion, the removal of this element is an important step in synchronizing the Corruption Law with the UNCAC. Therefore, the recommendation for its removal should focus on unlawful acts and asset recovery.
Downloads
References
Haga, C. S., & Siwy, N. A. (2023). The Juridical Analysis of the Urgency of Ratifying the Draft Law on Asset Forfeiture in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum.
Heryadi, A., & Bashori, K. (2022). Membangun Generasi Insan Kamil, Generasi Anti Korupsi. Ulumuddin: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman, 12(1), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.47200/ulumuddin.v12i1.955
Hamzah, A. (2005). Pemberantasan Korupsi Melalui Hukum Pidana Nasional dan Internasional. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Hiariej, E. O. (2019). United Nations Convention Against Corruption dalam sistem hukum Indonesia. Mimbar Hukum, 113-124.
Hukum Online. (2013, September 30). Akademisi: Hapus Kerugian Negara dari Unsur Korupsi. Diakses melalui Hukum Online: https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/akademisi--hapus-kerugian-negara-dari-unsur-korupsi-lt5248a99bb71aa/
Kesiranon, K. (2023). Scrutinize the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC): A Human Rights Critique on Defining Corruption and The Concrete Sanction. Journal of Contemporary Sociological Issues.
KPK. (2023, Februari 9). Ini Alasan Mengapa Korupsi Disebut Kejahatan Luar Biasa. Diakses melalui Anti Corruption Learning Centre KPK: https://aclc.kpk.go.id/aksi-informasi/Eksplorasi/20230209-ini-alasan-mengapa-korupsi-disebut-kejahatan-luar-biasa
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2016). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 25/PUU-XIV/2016.
Nisa, O. I., & Ismunarno. (2025). Penerapan Konvensi PBB Anti Korupsi (United Nation Convention Again Corruption) Dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional Indonesia Dengan Malaysia. Recidive: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan.
Noor, H. J. (2024, November 13). Unsur Melawan Hukum dan Merugikan Keuangan Negara. Diakses melalui Kompas: https://www.kompas.id/artikel/unsur-melawan-hukum-dan-merugikan-keuangan-negara
Prasetyo, A. (2025, Juni 25). Perhitungan BPKP di Kasus Impor Gula Tom Lembong Dikritik. Diakses melalui Hukum Online: https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/perhitungan-bpkp-di-kasus-impor-gula-tom-lembong-dikritik-lt685bc57c8af7e/?page=2
Rajan, S. C. (2020). A Social Theory of Corruption: Notes from the Indian Subcontinent. Harvard University Press.
Ridwan, Edi Setiadi, Rena Yulia, Dini Dewi Heniarti, Gialdah Tapiansari Batubara, dan Belardo Prasetya Mega Jaya. (2025) “Studi Komparatif Pemilihan Bentuk Pengaturan Tentang Model Penyusunan Tindak Pidana Korupsi dalam Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi Indonesia dan Malaysia (Comparative Study on the Choice of Regulatory Models for the Formulation of Corruption Crimes in the Anti-Corruption Laws of Indonesia and Malaysia). Jurnal Litigasi.
Rose, C., Kubiciel, M., & Landwehr, O. (2019). The United Nations Convention Against Corruption: A Commentary. Oxford University Press.
Saputra, R. (2021). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Bentuk Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang Merugikan Keuangan Negara Terutama Terkait Dengan Pasal 2 Ayat (1) UU PTPK). Jurnal Cita Hukum.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2019). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sulistya, A. R. (2024, Desember 26). Menelisik Arti Kerugian Negara Menurut Konstruksi Hukum di Indonesia. Diakses melalui Tempo: https://www.tempo.co/politik/menelisik-arti-kerugian-negara-menurut-konstruksi-hukum-di-indonesia-1186250
Sustainable Indonesia. (2025, Februari 20). Naik 3, Skor Indeks Persepsi Korupsi (CPI) Indonesia tahun 2024 masih tetap buruk. Diakses melalui Sustainable Indonesia: https://sustain.id/2025/02/ 20/naik-3-skor-indeks-persepsi-korupsi-cpi-indonesia-tahun-2024-masih-tetap-buruk/#:~:text=Jika%20dibandingkan%20dengan% 2010%20negara,Malaysia%2C%20Timor%20Leste%20dan%20Vietnam
Tim Garda Tipikor. (2016). Kejahatan Korupsi. Yogyakarta: Rangkang Education.
Transparency International. (2021, Juni 4). Indonesian Government Fails to Prove Its Anti-Corruption Commitment among the Member States. Diakses melalui Transparency International: https://ti.or.id/ indonesian-government-fails-to-prove-its-anti-corruption- commitment-among-the-member-states/
Transparency International. (2025). What is corruption? Diakses melalui Transparency International: https://www.transparency.org/en/ what-is-corruption
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2018). Safeguarding Against Corruption in Major Public Events: Participant Manual. Diakses melalui UNODC: https://www.unodc.org/documents/corruption/ Publications/Major_Public_Events_Training_Materials/Participant _Manual_Safeguarding_against_Corruption_in_MPE.pdf
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2023). UNCAC factsheet for ASEAN – Overview [PDF]. Diakses melalui United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime: https://www.unodc.org/roseap/uploads/ documents/Publications/2023/uncac/UNCAC_Factsheet_for_ASEAN_-_Overview.pdf
Wibowo, S., & Nurhayati, R. (2016). Perbedaan Pandangan Ajaran Sifat Melawan Hukum Materiil Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Padjajaran Journal of Law.
Wickberg, S. (2013). Comparative Analysis of the UNCAC and the OAS Convention. Transparency International. Diakses melalui Knowledge Hub Transparency International: https://knowledgehub. transparency.org/assets/uploads/helpdesk/ Comparative_analysis_ UNCAC_OAS_Convention.pdf
Wiraguna, S. A. (2024). Metode Normatif dan Empiris dalam Penelitian Hukum: Studi Eksploratif di Indonesia. Public Sphare: Jurnal Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan dan Hukum.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Christian Samuel Lodoe Haga, Ade Adhari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
