Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Pasca Perubahan Undang-undang dalam Perspektif Kelembagaan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47200/awtjhpsa.v5i1.3206Keywords:
CEC/KPK, independence, position, institutionAbstract
The revision of the Corruption Eradication Commission Law explicitly places it as a government institution within the executive branch. Additionally, the establishment of a Supervisory Board with the authority to grant permits for wiretapping, searches, and seizures has sparked debate regarding the limits of the KPK's independence. The issues raised in this study relate to the KPK's position after the amendment of the KPK Law and the KPK's independence as an executive body after the amendment of the KPK Law. The method used in this study is the normative legal method. The research results show that the position of the KPK after the amendment to the law falls within the executive branch of power, while the KPK's independence as an executive institution is now limited because its institutional position is under the administrative control of the government. the KPK can be restored as an independent institution free from interference by any power. In addition, strengthening institutional aspects, proportionate supervision, employe professionalism, and public transparency are key to maintaining the KPK's credibility as the front line in eradicating corruption.
Downloads
References
Asyikin, N., & Setiawan, A. (2020). Kedudukan KPK dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Pasca Diterbitkannya Revisi Undang-Undang KPK. Justitia Jurnal Hukum, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.30651/ JUSTITIA.V4I1.3736
Bagaswara, M. A., Suharso, S., Dewi, D. A. S., & Syafingi, H. M. (2022). Implikasi Perubahan Undang-Undang KPK Terhadap Independensi KPK (Kajian Yuridis Normatif Independensi dalam Perspektif Kelembagaan). Borobudur Law and Society Journal, 1(6), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.31603/7682
Campbell, J. W., & Danar, O. R. (2025). Institutional Independence, Credible Commitment, and Anti-corruption Reform Failure in Developing Contexts: Three Illustrative Examples from Indonesia. Public Integrity. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2025.2462294
Chetty, J., & Pillay, P. (2017). Independence of Anti-Corruption Agencies A Comparative Study of South Africa and India. African Journal of Public Affairs, 9(8), 105–120.
Firdaus, F. R., & Anggono, B. D. (2019). Menimbang Kewenangan DPR dalam Penggunaan Hak Angket Pada Kasus Korupsi KTP Elektornik. Lentera Hukum, 6(1), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.19184/ ejlh.v6i1.9545
Jacobs, L. G., & Wagner, B. B. (2017). Limits to the Independent Anti-Corruption Commission Model of Corruption Reform: Lessons from Indonesia. Global Business & Development Law Journa, 20, 327–332. www.u4.no/themes/aacc/accsucesses.cfm
Kaligis, R. V. (2020). Implikasi Hukum Atas Revisi Undangundang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 Tentang KPK Terhadap Penyelesaian Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Lex Crimen, 9(1). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/ v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/28545
Mchunu, N., Dunn, S., Zondi, T., & Nchabeleng, C. T. (2025). Public Perceptions of Corruption and Democratic Dissatisfaction in South Africa’s Third Decade of Democracy. Insight on Africa. https://doi.org/10.1177/09750878251353274
Mochtar, Z. A. (2021). Independensi Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Pasca Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019. Jurnal Konstitusi, 18(2), 321–344. https://doi.org/10.31078/JK1823
Mubarok, M. I., & Liany, L. (2020). Pergeseran Kedudukan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) Dalam Struktur Ketatanegaraan Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017. Lex Jurnalica, 17(1).
Nasuha, R. P., & Isharyanto, I. (2024). Independensi Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (KPK) Pasca Perubahan Undang-Undang KPK. Res Publica: Jurnal Hukum Kebijakan Publik, 8(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.20961/RESPUBLICA.V8I1.68866
Paramitha, D. A. H., & Husodo, J. A. (2023). Self-Regulatory Body Yang Ideal Untuk Memperkuat Independensi Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. Res Publica: Jurnal Hukum Kebijakan Publik, 7(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.20961/RESPUBLICA.V7I1.50204
Paranata, A. (2022). The miracle of anti-corruption efforts and regional fiscal independence in plugging budget leakage: evidence from western and eastern Indonesia. Heliyon, 8(10), e11153. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2022.E11153
Qamar, N., & Rezah, F. S. (2023). Wewenang Sebagai Instrumen Penyelenggararaan Pemerintahan Dalam Sistem Negara Hukum. Asas Wa Tandhim: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan Dan Sosial Keagamaan, 2(2), 201–222. https://doi.org/10.47200/AWTJHPSA.V2I2.1781
Rezah, F. S., & Sapada, A. T. (2023). The Independence and Accountability of the Constitutional Court in the Constitutional System in Indonesia. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 4(2), 247–260. https://doi.org/10.37276/ sjh.v4i2.166
Fernanda, S.Z. (2024). Dampak Revisi Undang-Undang KPK Terhadap Independensi dan Efektivitas KPK Dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi. Pakuan Law Review, 10. https://doi.org/https:// doi.org/10.33751/palar.v10i2
Xu, J., & Xu, J. (2024). Differential public support and the independence of anti-corruption agencies. European Political Science Review, 16(1), 72–93. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773923000231
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Farah Syah Rezah, Andi Tenri Sapada
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
