Kewenangan Kurator Untuk Mengurus Perseroan Terbatas Pailit

  • Ahmad Dwi Mulyatno
Keywords: Authority, Curator, Bankrupt Limited Liability Company

Abstract

The problems in this study are: 1) What is the authority of the curator to manage a limited liability company (PT) in bankruptcy?, 2) What is the curator’s responsibility for managing the bankruptcy estate of a limited liability company (PT) in the event of the curator’s negligence or error in managing a bankruptcy?. This type of research is normative. The technique of collecting legal materials uses literature study. The analytical technique used is qualitative descriptive authority. The results show that: 1) The curator in alimited liability company (PT) bankrupt is the transfer of authority to the curator which previously was the authority of the board of Directors only with regard to the management and or settlement of assets of a limited liability company (PT) bankrupt, the authority possessed by the curator in the bankruptcy of a limited liability company (PT) arises from tasks ordered by law. The use of such authority is immediately followed by their respective responsibilities for the implementation of their authority, while the exercise of authority that is not in accordance with legal provisions and causes losses to the company will result in legal consequences for the curator. 2) The curator’s responsibility for managing the assets of a limited liability company (PT) in bankruptcy consists of the curator’s responsibility in the curator’s capacity and the curator’s personal responsibility. Result in loss of bankruptcy estate. Meanwhile, all losses that arise as a result of negligence or due to the unprofessionalism of the curator are the personal responsibility of the curator and such losses cannot be charged to the bankruptcy estate.

References

Alweni, N. A., Baftim, F., & Ringkuangan, D. R. (2022). Pengurusan Harta Pailit Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Jurnal Lex Privatum, Vol. X No. 1: 151-161.

Anisah, Siti. (2008). Perlindungan Kepentingan Kreditor dan Debitor dalam Hukum Kepailitan di Indinesia. Total Media. Yogyakarta. 2008.

Aria Suyudi. Pusat Studi Hukum dan Kebijakan Indonesia (PSHK). Jakarta https://m.hukumonline.com.

Fuady, Munir. (2014). Hukum Pailit Dalam Teori Dan Praktek. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Hamonangan, A., Lubis, M. A., Taufiqurrahman, M.H.D., & Silaban, R. (2020). Peranan Kurator Terhadap Kepailitan Perseroan Terbatas. Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat MAJU UDA Universitas Dharma Agung Medan, 1 (1): 20-34.

Hartini, Rahayu. (2007). Hukum Kepailitan. Malang: UMM Press.

Hudyarto. (2021). Pertanggungjawaban Putusan Pailit Perseroan Terbatas. Jurnal Binamulia Hukum, 10 (1): 91-106.

Jono. (2015). Hukum Kepailitan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Khalid, A., Riswandi, I., & Salamiah. (2022). Aspek-Aspek Hukum Tentang Permohonan Pernyataan Pailit. Al’Adl: Jurnal Hukum, 14 (1): 218-231.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.

Mulyadi, Lilik. (2013). Perkara Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) Teori dan Praktik. Bandung: Alumni.

Nadapdap, Binoto. (2013). Hukum Perseroan Terbatas Berdasarkan UU No. 40 Tahun 2007. Jakarta : Permata Aksara.

Nainggolan, Bernard. (2015). Transparansi Dalam Pemberesan Boedel Pailit. Bandung: Alumni.

Nating, Imran. (2005). Peran Dan Tanggung Jawab Kurator Dalam Pengurusan Dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit, Edisi Revisi 2. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Simanjuntak, Ricardo. (2005). Esensi Pembuktian Sederhana Dalam Kepailitan. Jakarta: Pusat Kajian Hukum.

Singal, N. Y., Rumimpunu, F., & Tampongangoy, G. H. (2022). Kajian Hukum Tanggung Jawab Kurator Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Kepailitan Pasca Putusan Pengadilan Niaga. Jurnal Lex Privatum, Vol. X No. 1: 229-239.

Sjahdeini, S. R. (2010). Hukum Kepailitan Memahami Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan. Jakarta: PT Pustaka Utama Grafiti.

Sunggono, Bambang. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas.

Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Undang-Undang Kepailitan dan PKPU.

Yuherman. (2012). Konsekuensi Peralihan Kewenangan Direksi Dalam Kepailitan PerseroanTerbatas, Jurnal Supremasi Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sahid, Jakarta.

Published
2022-07-29
How to Cite
Mulyatno, A. (2022). Kewenangan Kurator Untuk Mengurus Perseroan Terbatas Pailit. Asas Wa Tandhim: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan Dan Sosial Keagamaan, 1(2), 155 - 178. Retrieved from https://jurnal.ucy.ac.id/index.php/awtjhpsa/article/view/1280
Section
Articles